Joanne (Pete) Lockwood

Lockwood was born Peter, in 1965. He has been married at least thirty one years and has at least two children. He has quite a lot of content on his own podcast and has done interviews where he explains that he sold his business, predictably in IT, to live his authentic truth. He appears to have started living full-time in his late fifties. Subsequently he got caught up in tax arrears, lost his house and took out an IVA which is an agreement to pay off his creditors. It’s worth thinking about in what predicament this left his wife. Also worth reflecting on this which is on his YouTube channel. £7000 spent on personal grooming.

He has recently begun to be trotted out on GB News which is where I came across him. Before I get into all his other content it is worth looking at this Channel 4 documentary which focuses on Jo/Pete getting a new wig.

In marked contrast to his wife Lockwood is clearly giddy with the attention he is getting. Marie, his wife, has to go outside and in another space to hide her tears. Her husband has already been on hormones for two years but watching him get a more permanent weave/wig is clearly traumatising.

Clearly she is wondering how she will feel sexually attractive to him whilst he emphasises that he doesn’t want to lose her because they are best friends. He needs a woman to cos play as his girl friend to make the fantasy real.

The young hairdresser sees Marie go outside and Lockwood emphasises his care for her and his empathy, the cynic in me thinks he has read that females are more empathetic and so he must perform it now he is a “Lady”. Her distress provides another opportunity for him to indulge his fantasy.

By contrast Marie constantly suppresses her own feelings to prioritise her husbands but she is clearly struggling.

Lockwood can barely suppress his excitement at his transformation and, in a very revealing, aside he lets slip what this is really all about. There are three of them in this marriage and two of them are Pete/Jo.

After expressing her difficulty with accepting his transformation and indication that divorce couls still be on the cards they have this exchange. He did try to inject somewhat of a questioning tone to his voice but the words are stark.

Marie tries to make light of it and jokes that he would have to get divorced first snd also that she still has not made her mind up. Clearly this attempt at levity is too much of her and she moves away and turns her back on the camera and is clearly sobbing, Notice how every time she dares to think about the impact on her she soon centres her husband. She knows he is the most important person in this drama, to everybody around her and doesn’t even dare to say the truth that its invaded HER life.

Meanwhile The husband talks like a teenage boy fantasising about his very own pair of tits. I don’t know any women who celebrate the bouncing breasts of the stairs climber. But “Jo” finds this validating. Interestingly this was the segment of the show about how Marie was finding it difficult to come to terms with and it soon becomes clear they are in separate beds.

He cant see anything beyond his own need for validation. The next seen is a visit to a couple who are friends. Marie has decided not to go and look at how her husband describes this and how soon he brings the discussion to focus on himself. Her pain is another opportunity to revel in his own “femininity”

When he arrives at the friends’ house, without his wife he can’t resist telling them that it was Marie who put his hair in a bun while he asks the male friend which hair colour he prefers referring to his previous, blond, wig. Men like this require validation from males as well as females.

Marie must have some good friends who have told her what he is doing is selfish. Bravo her for feeling able to vocalise it. “Selfish” is in her top ten of words to describe what he is doing. That is not all he is doing but Marie likely doesnt have any experience of this and is blindsided after thirty one years of marriage.

The show ends with Marie and “Jo” celebrating their thirty first wedding anniversary with a trip to Amsterdam.

You can watch it here

The Making Of Me

I will do a follow up piece on his podcast content and his new career as a public speaker and diversity consultant. I have already listened to his first podcast where he, predictably, picked (tricked?) a woman with a PhD who talks about neuroscience and discrimination against women in the workplace. Ironically she is big on trusting your instincts but thinks some women should deny their instinctive recognition of men, She was smug and infuriating…till next time.

You can support my work by taking out a paid subscription to my substack or donating below. All donations gratefully receive and they do help me cover my costs and also to keep content open for those not able to contribute. (I will add other methods as soon as I have figured it out. 😉)

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Tweedale. Part 4!

Featured

This is another one of the panels that hosted Tweedale. His contributions were illuminating, as were those of his co panelists. All of the other participants seemed well meaning but I am not sure they have thought beyond #BeKind.

The panel were discussing Faith and LGBT issues at Bradford University. Tweedale turned up in his signature choker with dark glasses and a top hat in view.

Here’s a link where you can watch 👇.

Faith and LGBT

Also on the panel were a Labour councillor, a Humanist /Feminist and Lesbian, a Catholic teacher and a Few Muslim voices, as you would expect in Bradford.

I was already aware of Dunbar who is very pro what he thinks of as “trans” rights. (He is the nephew of Andrea Dunbar, the playwright). In 2022 he announced he would not be standing at the next local elections.

Dunbar seems to see everything through the lens of the T, despite being a gay man; who’s very sexual orientation is under attack, by trans ideology.

Janice Thornton is a committed feminist activist having been involved in a grass roots organisation set up to oppose their local MP, Phillip Davies, who is outspoken in his opposition to feminist voices. She covers this in the talk and it shows a tiny organisation was able to mobilise opposition, to Davies, managing to get a march of over 1400 in a short time. Shipley was the town Womens Equality Party (WEP) chose to launch its first parliamentary candidate. There was local opposition to the decision, by WEP, to field a candidate thus splitting the vote and making it more, not less, likely that Davies would be returned to Parliament; which he duly was.

Jez Hodgson is a longtime teacher of religious education and, then, the regional cordinator of an organisation called Quest. I looked them up and this is what I found. It is indeed an LGBT+ Catholic group who, in the past, hosted Ruth Hunt, former CEO of Stonewall and herself a Catholic, plus Beardsley who is “transgender” and a United Reform Church Minister.

Two other attendees were the LGBT officers for Bradford University and Bradford College, respectively. Both seem like well meaning, young, people who want to make the world a better place, however misguided I think they were/are.

(NB. It should be “to” not “too”, in the image below. Apologies)

I cover this discussion not to bring opprobrium on the participants but to demonstrate how well meaning people go along with absurdities when confronted with this ideology. Tweedale, a man, introduces himself as a Lesbian in front of an actual Lesbian 😳. This is why we must stop the forced-teaming of the LGB with the T. Heterosexual men do not belong in the Gay Rights movement.

We also learn that Tweedale is a Pagan, former teacher, and quite proud of his innovative modification to the curriculum; adding Paganism. Claiming that all religions are accepting of LGBT peoples is a somewhat bold claim. 👇

Then one of the Muslim participants talks about the different interpretations of Islam throughout the ages and how cultural claims can distort Islamic teaching. He is very “inclusive” talking about his gay, Christian and Jewish friends. Unfortunately his “inclusive” stance also includes a tale that there was a “transgender” person who looked after one of the prophet Mohammed’s wives.

I am, obviously, not an Islamic scholar but I did a search to find reference to “Het” which I may have misheard. He is correct that some cultures found a way of integrating gay men in society, and to a lesser extent Lesbians, by pretending they were the opposite sex/gender. Some of these, muslim led, cultures, for example Iran, do not accept homosexuals, at all, but do accept men and women who adopt an opposite sex role and they also fund “transition” surgeries. It seems to be quite a complex picture. Here, Mohammed, is reported as being uncomfortable with men who adopt a “female” role.

Mukhannathun was also used to describe gay men and people with disorders of sexual development.

State Religion

There follows an interesting discussion about the role of secularism, separation of Church and State and what happens when the State adopts,and mandates, adherence to a specific religion. Tweedale had this to say which put me in mind of the State imposition of the neo-religion of Queer Theory /All things LGBTQ+.

Brexit, Trump and the Far Right.

There is an undercurrent of alarmism about the rise of the far right which, for some participants, is linked to the vote for Brexit. As someone who campaigned for Remain, including in Bradford, this seems somewhat unhinged, particularly as Bradford voted for Brexit and the voters for Brexit included a large section of the Asian diaspora. Tweedale was not the only one indulging in hyperbole on this topic and confusing the political landscape in the United States with that of the U.K.

Neo-Feminism jumps to Gender Fluidity

Next we hear from a female muslim who is a member of an “inclusive” mosque. First she describes the reaction to a female religious leader who appeared with uncovered hair. Shortly thereafter she burnishes her progressive credentials with a reference to gender identity ideology. LGBTQ+ is merely part of an off the peg list of approved beliefs which allow people to blend a concern about the visibility of female role models to move seamlessly onto a denial that male and female exist. Sigh.

Teaching LGBT + issues

This man is a secular member of the panel who is concerned about the campaign against compulsory sex education in schools, via, he says, powerful Religious Lobby groups. His first mistake was mentioning a member of the demented, Green Party and his second was conflating sex education with LGBT. I can’t be the only person who was very pro sex education in schools who would now be opposed because its a gift to Transgender Lobby groups/proponents of Queer Theory.

Topher interjects to proclaim a desire to be an activist teacher on LGBT issues.

The issue of disseminating transgender ideology is clearly extending to different faith communities and here a teacher/youth worker, claims her pupils, mainly muslim girls, chose LGBTQ topics of their own volition.

It is worth following this part of the dialogue and what is meant by “safe” spaces by this individual. Her perspective is that pupils must be allowed to express their opinions, or their “bigotry” so that they can be led to the sunny uplands of the correct opinions.

Now the Catholic teacher talks about his experience teaching in Catholic schools and he has an interesting observation on the impact of Section 28. This clearly contradicts the LGBT agenda and even the Gay Rights party line predating the addition of the T.

He continues on this theme and seems irritated by the assumptions of some the panel about current teaching in Catholic schools. This is an unhelpful narrative for the victimology aficionados who catastrophise the legacy of Section 28, even today, often to turbo charge fundraising.

Not sure what I think about this. When I was a teenager I went on a Catholic retreat, with my school. We all had to have one to one discussions with a monk /priest about our faith. My interview was a discussion about being an atheist and the idea whether people, like me, without faith have a moral compass. What did EVERY single one of the boys get asked about…?

You guessed it..their masturbatory habits 😳.

In comes Tweedale, a heterosexual man, to claim he was a hero during the time of Section 28, boasting that he pledged to break the law and he did. There is a strong streak of narcissism in these statements.

Not content with that bit of grandstanding he claims that he left teaching on a matter of principle and laughably that he wanted to promote critical thinking.

Something tells me this may not be the whole story about Tweedale’s exit from teaching. In the meantime he is being feted by other organisations.

All of the above puts me in mind of the Late, Great, Magdalen Berns.

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

I’m better than you: Jordan Gray

Featured

Jordan Gray has had quite a bit of coverage already, but I have been sent a few links and it seems worthwhile to add a post on the U.Ks Dylan Mulvaney: with added smut. Jordan Gray is a queer theory version of Benny Hill, who is trying to take the man out of Bernard Manning.

He first came to my attention when Channel 4 used him on a reboot of Ben Elton’s Friday Night Live. Elton ( He/Him. Who knew?) hosted and began with an abject capitulation to the show noun nonsense. Gray displayed his hormonally atrophied (I assume) penis and used it to play the piano. All standard fare for the trash tv favoured by Channel 4.

The more noteworthy aspect of Gray’s act was the lyrics to his song, which dripped with contempt for women.The refrain was “Better Than You”. He comes across as an incredible narcissist. The lyrics are illustrative of the way these men express their misogyny. There is a peculiar hatred of women expressed by men who cannot be us.

Educate and Celebrate

Gray was a patron of the above charity (Educate and Celebrate) along with Peter Tatchell, at the time of his Channel 4 appearance,

After his “performance” Gray was removed as a patron for the, now defunct, charity Educate and Celebrate. The charity moved swiftly to deny Gray had been into schools, on their behalf, and sought to disassociate from him.

Unfortunately, for them, it soon emerged the chair of trustees, Julie Bremner, had promoted his appearance.

I had a look at their entry on the Charity Commission website and it no longer appears to list their trustees. However, I downloaded them last year to have a look.

This is Julie Bremner and Elly Barnes, taken from their annual report.👇

Dame Vicky Paterson was executive head of three schools and achieved her Dame hood for services to education.

Remarkably this charity attracted government funding 👇

In a statement,following the closure, of the charity Bremner promised to be back in another guise.

Jordan Gray in schools.

He visited the Passmore Academy for International Women’s Day to inspire the school children.

It was not just secondary schools. He also went into primary schools at the behest of Educate and Celebrate.

Here is another example of him with Elly Barnes. 👇

Here he is with trans activist Lady Phyll.

Even more worrying he claims to be talking to toddlers about this topic.

Mermaids Fundraiser.

This man also fundraised for another controversial charity, Mermaids. He was in good company having been preceded by John Barrymore and Lorraine Kelly on DigiFest2020.

Channel 4. BBC Radio 4 and ITV.

After performing his mysogynistic song, Gray bashed a piano with his penis and completed his display with full frontal nudity which not only showcased his penis but also his hormonally induced chesticles.

Channel 4 were very proud of this performance. Here is Alex Mahon defending Gray’s display.

As if this wasnt insult enough they gave the talentless di** an award.

Not to be outdone BBC Radio 4 soon jumped on the bandwagon. Having waded through some of his content for the purposes of this piece, I can attest he is extremely unfunny and a bit of a one trick pony.

Bonus Content.

After I published I was sent this radio 4 show on “Breast Medicine” and of course Jordan Gay was invited to discuss his “breasts” along side a woman who actually had breast cancer and someone who pioneers the use of artifical intelligence to improve detection rates for breast cancer.

Breast Medecine

Somebody also reminded me that he appeared on ITV Transformation Street, where we find him having fake implants in his chest and trying on a wedding dress, for him, not for his fiancee.

Transformation Street

“Trans” day of Visibility.

This is a very revealing interview. Gray claims to be a Lesbian. How hetrosexual men have manged to hijack the gay rights movement will, eventually, produce numerous PhDs.

This man has no intention of removing his penis because his girlfriend likes it.

Here is his advice to others followimg in his footsteps. He makes it clear that everyone else’s discomfort is a price he is willing to pay. People can stand being a bit uncomfortable, apparently.

He also complains about trans bodies being fetishised unless, of course, that is your thing. Mustn’t kink shame.

Previous attempts to gain fame.

As far as I could see no judges turned around but he seems to have got a place on the Voice in 2016. Worth watching the performance which is incredibly bad. Subsequently I was told that another contestant, allegedly, dropped out for unspecified reasons and this allowed the judges to reintroduce him to the competition. I am not an avid watcher of these kind of shows but I am told this is highly unusual.

Cass Report

I was not going to write on Gray until this from Joe Lycett’s show. Gray is not only feted by Channel 4, Radio 4 but also by a host of comedians like Lycett, Ritchie Herring, Ben Elton and Russel Howard. This perforance,again on Channel 4, is the mist despicable, damaging contribution to public life i have seen. Imagine making a joke about the thousands of children, irrevocably harmed by gender “medicine”

You can watch his youTubes below. First up is his contribution to “trans” visibility. Gray On Trans Visibility

Here is his appearance at Passmore Academy school.

At Passmore Academy

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Eve Echo

Featured

Trans in the city

Eve is another trans activist and part of the stable that is Trans in The City. This is his bio:👇 Notice he boasts that he was part of the Good Law Project’s High Court case against NHS England to protest NHS waiting times. Of course they lost.

Eve is the media person at Trans in The City and boasts of their collaboration with the esteemed, peer reviewed journal Pink News.

He is yet another Trans Activist who has inveigled his way into the Crown Prosecution Services, to sit on their Hate Crime panel.

He also boasts about advising the London Metropolitan Police and is part pf their learning and development team.

Eve Echo also gave a Ted Ex talk specifically for women. This was Teeside Women.

What did the man, who has a wife who is a tatoo artist, choose for his topic? Apparently it was billed as a talk on seizing opportunities but he wasn’t going to talk about that. He turned up in a sort of baby doll dress, like something Grayson Perry would wear.

He announced he would be changing the topic of his talk and began to wax lyrical about his nipples! Yes, thats right. He dresses it up in some sort of pseudo, feminist, argument about the way women are oppressed because our culture doesn’t allow women to display their nipples, in public, but we allow this privilege to men. I hope by now women, if only my readers, are wise to this tactic.

In another YouTube he delved into the vexed issue of trans-exclusion in the field of Sport. He appeared along side Verity Smith (ex of Mermaids) and another Trans in the City person, Oscar Hoyle. Heres what he had to say which was the usual bad faith argument.

Eve is really angry about campaigns for single sex sports and expresses it with the usual tinpot totalitarian vibe.

This is an overview after watching all the content I could find. If it is a little thin its because there does not seem to be much depth to our Mr Echo. Also one of his interviews was along side Freda Wallace and he didn’t get much of a look in. Another one of the panel appearances was along side an elderly trans activist, Roz Kavenney so he was somewhat over shadowed there too. He likes to describe himself as gobby and does not give much biographical detail, though he does let slip he used to play Chess tournaments for his Cheshire school.

He is not a very interesting subject but is working with the police, the CPS, and is part of an exhibition at the Science Museum so hundreds of school children will have been exposed to him.

Here are the YouTube links

Gender Nebulous

And this one from Trans in the City.

With Verity Smith from Mermaids

This is the link to his Ted Talk.

The One with the Nipples

I think its about time I covered Roz Kavenney, so I might do him next.

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Gender Affirming Care: 2008

Featured

Thanks to twitter user @Tea94852859 I was alerted to this paper from 2008, on whether or not to block puberty, Here it is : 👇

08sep-cohen-kettenis-jsm2008

Before I covered this paper I had a look at Peggy Cohen-Kettenis to see any interviews she had given. I found her make this statement about “Patient B” who was the inspiration for beginning pubertal suppression in children who presenting with “gender incongruence”. Here’s was Cohen-Kettenis had to say about “Patient B”

You have to look at Michael Biggs work to get a little more detail on “patient B” 👇

It later transpired that patient B was also a Lesbian.

Cohen-Kettenis was described as “brave” by John Money. 👇

John Money was the man responsible for experimenting on the Reimer twins. One of the twins had a botched circumcision which destroyed his penis. Money advised his parents to raise him as a girl and hide this sex from him. Later it was also revealed that the twins were subject to some sexual impropriety at the hands of Money. It was hidden for many years that the experiment failed and the twin realised he was actually male and reverted to living as a man. Tragically, both twins committed suicide.

Cohen-Kettenis also does not dwell on the boy who died during the attempt to fashion a simulacra of female genitalia. This outcome is given in one sentence, in the report on the outcomes of the Dutch Protocol.

Again Michael Biggs sheds more light on the reason why this patient died. He died as a result of complications from surgery, that were a direct consequence of the pubertal suppression.

She proceeds to describe how feminine were the people who had early treatment and mentions Nikki, of Nikki’s Tutorials, who is a make up YouTuber. Nikki is a hugely successful social influencer who recently married another man. So, another homosexual who has been “transed”. We will never know what Nikki’s life could have been or whether he could have lived happily as a gay man.

I was inclined to sympathy for Nikki until someone sent me this information about him representing women at the United Nations.

Nikki did not start puberty suppression till age 14 which, from my research, would suggest he had already reached the age of sexual function. Unlike the kids who have their puberty blocked earlier and, as Marci Bowers, president of WPATH, admitted will be rendered anorgasmic.

You can watch her here

Peggy Cohen Kettenis

The paper: Remember this was in 2008!

Here is the abstract.

Pro-Pubertal suppression

The paper outlines the arguments in favour of pubertal suppression and those against. The pro-arguments focus on avoiding the “torment” of going through the wrong puberty and the passability of those wishing to mimic the opposite sex. She does outline some research suggestive of the idea that there may be a biological cause for “Gender incongruence”. However even she is not confident in the research and concedes that, in the absence of a definitive diagnostic tool, we are reliant on the subjective assessment of the patient, which will likely be mediated through a practitioner of “gender medicine”.

She also admits that all the research shows a shocking percentage of these kids will resolve their gender incongruence, if left alone. It is not highlighted that most of these kids would simply turn out to be gay.

She admits that there are some clinicians who are less than confident about the interventions based on the diagnostic tools available. Here it is described it as “a less than solid foundation” for the medical interventions prescribed.

The arguments pro pubertal suppression centre on the children who have presented with a persistent rejection of their natal sex. The authors describe a myriad of mental health conditions that they argue are not co-morbid with the “gender dysphoria” but are rather caused by the Gender Identity Disturbance. They report parents and patients confirmed there was a relief of suffering once puberty was halted. This, they argue, gave the patients “time to think” a phrase that, some would argue, is undermined by the fact that 98% + continue onto cross sex hormones. Yet, the authors present the opposite argument, the continuance on this path is because the diagnostic criteria applied has a high degree of accuracy.

There is a high premium placed on “passability” as the opposite sex. The emphasis on this seems in part driven by the masculine appearance of the late transitioning males who wish to pass as women. This is less of an issue for females who take testosterone who, at least superficially, more likely to pass as small men.

The other argument is that stopping the development of secondary sexual characteristics removes some unnecessary surgeries. moreover it is argues that there are worse outcomes the later the surgery takes place. Finally the authors contend that not providing this option risks patients seeking illegal means to access the drugs.

The case against: When in doubt abstain?

We now move onto the arguments opposed to these early interventions. These centre around the difficulty of diagnosis and skepticism about the stability of the child’s /adolescent identity. In addition the physical development brought about through puberty may resolve the “gender incongruence” . (In particular relationships my develop that enable acceptance of a homosexual orientation which, bizarrely, is not mentioned).

The high rates of desistance are, to my mind, a particularly compelling argument. 80-95% would be better off if left alone! Again. no mention of how many of these would simply be gay!

Another risk relates to bone density and brain maturation.

The riskier surgery for males deprived of normal penile development.👇. The authors argue that new techniques have been developed to address this issue but note that Jazz Jennings required revisions after his surgery as do many other “transitioners” who have gone public about their surgeries.

This is all an experiment driven by the belief in “gender identity” as an innate facet of the “trans” child. Yet the authors speak of the torment of going through a natural puberty.

The authors describe blocking puberty as reversible but also concede that the impact on brain maturation is unknown. 🤷‍♀️

The authors conclude my claiming that not intervening is more of an ethical dilemma than intervening. We are a long way from ending this practice. Cass Review is out this week but, sadly, I don’t anticipate it saying what needs saying.

You can see the work of Michael Biggs in this YouTube. His work is exemplary.

Michael Biggs

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Katie Neeves; UN Women

Featured

I only became aware of “Katie” because he was one of the men asked to represent women at the United Nations. He’s very proud of this achievement. This is him boasting about it on linkedin.

He is not the only man representing women at the United Nations. Monroe Bergdorf, Bobbi Pickard and Pippa Bunce were also delegates. All promoted by the faux feminist charity UN Women U.K. which I cover in this piece.

UN Women U.K. (Faux Feminism)

He also boasted about a speaking engagement on International Women’s day.

Not to be outdone the BBC, lately the propaganda arm of the trans lobby, promoted another man at the vanguard of the attack on women’s rights. Our Katie was hired by the BBC!

Neeves also now claims to be a Lesbian and the Vichy Lesbian, Linda Riley, at Diva Magazine, was only too happy to agree.

Dupers Delight!

There is a lot to work with when investigating Neeves. Like many other of these men he is publicity hungry and superficially “honest” about his back story. I sometimes call this “Dupers Delight” . This refers to the dopamine rush when getting away with a lie. The woman behind @TransWidowsVoices goes one better, she calls it “strategic minimisation” and once she named it I couldn’t stop seeing it. As soon as I find myself grateful for any frankness in “trans” narratives, I remind myself I am being hoodwinked.

Cross-Dressing.

Cross-Dressing usually involves an erotic component and will usually involve masturbating, the borrowed items add to the sexual thrills as does the secrecy. Many men report being able to hold themselves in check for years but something then triggers the need to perform full-time. Sometimes this involves the wife becoming ill or the birth of a child. Often a female child.

Neeves has made a number of revealing disclosures about his previous (current) life as a cross-dresser. Like a lot of these men they often locate this confession in their pre-pubertal existence to deflect from any recognition of any erotic component to the activity. Neeves is one such.

Neeve’s cross dressing continued with him accessing his sister’s clothes and later his wife’s. Gulf and self-loathing would follow. Like a lot of these men he describes attempts to get this under control until. aged 48, he succumbed to his inclinations completely.

He also stole his wife’s clothes. Here he discusses it with another male who claims womanhood.

He went through two marriages over this fixation. He eventually married his second wife in 2017 but it was not long before he made the decision to “transition” full-time shortly after.

He provides more details in this article about creeping into his sister’s room. to steal her underwear and celebrates access to his wife’s clothes on their marriage. His second wife accepted his cross-dressing but only if he kept it to once a week and didn’t want to “transition” . He was also asked to restrict his “dressing” to times when his daughter was not around. He broke every one of those promises shortly after they married. The marriage ended but he is very open about how “accepting” his daughter is and describes taking her with him, while dressed as “Katie”, in the hope of winning his elderly mother round.

Martin, like many of these men, describes an escalating compulsion he could no longer control. Conveniently these transvestites can claim “Gender Dysphoria” but the real truth is much darker. Gender Dysphoria is the cover story. Envying women is another feature of this fetish. Claiming women’s awards is the ultimate display of male dominance and misogyny.

J.K Rowling.

Neeves reached out to “educate” J.K Rowling with an open letter, dripping with passive aggression and patronising to a disturbing degree. He tells the egregious lie that her words have directly led to self harm and even suicide.

He mentions her often on the various podcasts.

His feminine side?

Katie describes the impact of the hormones on his personality. He claims to be more prone to crying especially when watching films with his daughter

This is another common fantasy in men who larp as women.

There is plenty of material about Katie on his YouTube channel. Cool2BTrans. These clips are from these interviews linked below.

Interview with a handmaiden

Interview by another cross-dresser

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Skye Morden: Policing Women

Featured

There is a huge amount of coverage of “Skye” who seems to be somewhat of a self-publicist. I have waded through a lot of his content but I find this interview, with another man who calls himself “Katie”, the most revealing. Morden is a serving police officer who trains his fellow police officers on the use of tasers and maintaining public order, including policing public protests. He is also involved with Trans In The City with Bobbi Picard, who I have also covered on this blog. He was 44 when he began cross-dressing on a full-time basis, after splitting from his wife.This was the only interview where he reveals his history of transvestism, I could find. He does not dwell on this in later interviews.

Cross-Dressing history

Neeves asks him to describe his realisation that he was “trans”. His follows the traditional narrative that he has always known. He explains this in quite a disturbing way.

He describes having to lock these feelings away to contain his feelings of anger and hate. The sexologist described this as a particular kind of misogyny shared by men who wish they were women.

Morden proceeds to describes his history of cross-dressing.

Here “Katie” and “Skye” share a moment describing how euphoric they both felt when they could finally cross-dress in public. Dupers Delight?

The “intersex” gambit.

Morden describes how he felt emboldened to come out as “trans” after reading propaganda about people with differences of sexual development (DSD’s Sometimes called intersex) and reading the discredited work of Anne Fausto-stirling.

In fact people with differences of sexual development (DSD’s) are all either male, or female. Moreover testing for DSDs was abandoned at the U.K.’s main gender clinic because this was not found to be a factor in their referrals.

Morden references the work of Fausto-Sterling directly in this interview. Claims of a pseudo-scientific basis for “gender identity” are obviously a lot more palatable than admitting to being a furtive cross-dresser who may do so for erotic purposes.

Fausto-Sterling famously claimed that there were five sexes; something she later claimed was tongue-in-cheek.

This was debunked by this paper:

Biologist Colin Wright also took issue with Fausto-Sterling.

Rewriting history.

Morden was very public about his “transition” even reaching out for press coverage. This appeared in the Daily Mail. He talks at length about the international coverage this garnered. He is very committed to being highly visible.

Morden also peddles the discredited myths about how Gay rights were secured by “trans” people.

In fact the person often credited as a “black trans woman” was a gay man who wore drag and he arrived late to the Stonewall riots. The riot was actually started by a Lesbians and gay men. You can learn the actual history from Fred Seargent: 👇

Fred Seargent Interview

Hate Crime?

Here Morden talks about what he thinks should happen to anyone who correctly sexes people and how he sees his role.

Morden wants to improve community relations between the police and the “trans” community. He is, once again, focussed on misgendering.

Morden claims to have had millions of abusive comments levelled at him on social media and in real life. He made sure these accounts were covered in the press.

The context for this online backlash was the police guidance which claimed a person search need only ensure that a person is of the same “gender identity” not the same sex as a detainee. Here’s what Skye had to say about that.

Birmingham police force made a public intervention on Morden’s behalf.

Morden clearly sees himself as a martyr to the course and describes the bravery he needs to daily brave the outside world as his “authentic self”

Including this two image because he seems quite proud of it and it provoked a lot of on line commentary.

You can watch this discussion below.

Skye Morden Cool 2B Trans

More interviews.

This is a link to all the interviews I looked at.

Playlist

You can support my work by taking out a paid subscription to my substack or donating below. All donations gratefully received and they do help me cover my costs and also to keep content open for those not able to contribute. My renewal fees came out this month so a small donation would be greatly appreciated. Only give if you can afford.

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Pippa Bunce: UN Women

Featured

A man for the salary: A woman for the photo gallery,

Bunce is another man who has been selected to represent women at the United Nations. Bunce isn’t even larping as a woman full time. He describes himself as non-binary and gender fluid and decides how he will present when he wakes up in the morning. This man is a senior manager at Credit Suisse and has held positions at Goldman Sachs and the Bank of England. He’s also been married for 25 years and has two adult children.

As is my custom, I have hunted down as many interviews as I could find to discover what makes Bunce tick. Clearly he likes taking women’s prizes as he boasts about it on his linkedin. I wonder how his wife and daughter feel about this? Notice there are no male pronouns, despite the gender fluid thing, but he does claim female She/Her/They.

Here he boasts about taking up places intended for women, as well as being on the LGBT forums despite being a heterosexual male with a fetish for dressing up in stereotypically female outfits. I guess this is what queering homosexuality looks like.

LSE Pride podcast

Rather disappointedly I couldn’t find that Bunce had done interviews on the usual trans activist podcasts, because I find these men are more unguarded when speaking to other cross-dressing men. I did, however, find this interview which he does along side a Lesbian, Arlene McDermott, who is happy to work with Bobbi Pickard at Trans In The City; despite Pickard, a heterosexual man, claiming to be a Lesbian. Also on the panel was another trans activist, Antonia Belcher and BBC Journalist Jane Hill.

Here’s how Bunce introduced himself to the panel. I find myself skeptical because these terms were not in common parlance at the time, and in any case, unlikely to have been familiar to a 5 year old. He repeats this claim, again and again, and he is never challenged on it.

Jane Hill is a BBC News journalist and a Lesbian. She is also involved with these two organisations 👇. ( I am told she has cut long term friends out of her life who are skeptical of gender ideology. ). Antonia Belcher is one of the board members on the Albert Kennedy Trust. Belcher is another man who led a secret life as a transvestite and is now dressing full time, with the support of his wife, of forty years, and, presumably, his three children.

You can watch the event here:👇

LSE Event

Human Centred Leadership: Police Force

Next up is an interview with someone with a background in the police force. I am not sure whether he is a serving member. He is clearly star struck with our Pippa, He is also a must credulous interviewer. He lets this slip by without challenge. 👇. Pippa doesn’t buy into the male /female thing but nevertheless feels compelled to wear massive fake tits to awards ceremonies.

The interviewer shows a worrying lack of understanding about the law. Here’s what he says about the (legally) protected characteristics. 👇

There is an amusing aside when the interviewer asks Bunce to share any negative reactions he has had out in public and is treated to this, thinly veiled, fantasy. The interviewers naïveté is on display here, far from suspecting his unwitting inclusion in a fantasy, he agrees that, yes, Pippa is gorgeous. 🤡

Again, for those who like a deep dive, the full interview is linked below. It would be worthwhile counting out how many times Bunce talks about his “authentic self” and his preoccupation with the role of allies and how “inclusivity” is not just inviting someone to the dance but being prepared to dance with them. This is a demand dressed up as common courtesy. Whole interview is packed to the rafters with cliched talking points.

Bunce and the Police Officer

Being An Ally and a Friend: Protoviti U.K.

I have included this one even though the sound disappears relatively early on. Protoviti is a global consulting form which proudly invites its staff to being their whole self to work.

Bunce introduces himself to the panel and on line audience. Of course nobody expresses any skepticism.

I included this interview because it reveals some of Bunces partnerships. He also reveals that he had links to the United Nations prior to the announcement he has been selected to represent women by the UN Women U.K. He is also an ambassador for Stonewall amd has spoken at Parliament, worked with the Government Equality Office and the BBC. He also works with schools and Universities. (I searched Hansard for any reference to Bunce, I did not find anything.)

Bunce even manages to sneak in the gender bread person. He stumbles over how to define biological sex but implies that someone who has had genital surgery moves sex categories. He delivers this in schools and boardrooms.

Before I leave this interview I would just comment that there is a real epidemic of made up statistics infection the trans spokespeople. The most egregious ones are the uttter lies about suicide rates and those exaggerating trans murder rates and rates of abuse. I am calling bull shit on all of the stats shared by Bunch in his presentation. Nobody EVER asks for these to be backed up.

Bunch talks to Global Consultancy Firm

Pippa About Town!

I will just leave you with some images of Pippa about town. Notice that he is invariable in “girl mode” when collecting awards for his ability to make wearing prosthetic boobs a civil rights cause. Below he appears with Dawn Butler, M.P.

For reasons above I am in a bit more need this month as I have just had my renewal fee. Only give if you can afford.

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Un Women U.K. : Pickard 2

Featured

Bobbi Pickard : Part Two

You can read part one here:

UN Women UK: Pickard 1

Bobbi Pickard is a trans-identified man who came to my attention after UN Women U.K. nominated him, and a few other men, to represent women at a conference run by the United Nations. I have written about UN Women U.K. here: 👇

UN Women U.K. (Faux Feminism)

In part two we will look at Pickard’s company and corporate support and examine the role he claims to have played in advancing “trans” rights in complete disregard for the impact on other protected groups and the health of children designated “trans”.

Pickard founded this company, after claiming his woman identity in 2017. It was incorporated in 2022. There’s not much information in the accounts, in terms of donors. They don’t have a huge balance sheet. (There are new accounts due out shortly so I will update when they are out)

They seem to wield rather a lot of soft power rather than financial clout. Here’s on of the directors of Trans in the City. One of them is this Arlene Mcdermott, a Lesbian , who is in a senior position at the London Stock exchange. This explains why Pickard was the first “trans” person to close the London Stock exchange and why they have an annual event for “trans” people at the London Stock Exchange (LSEG).

Pickard’s website for Trans in the City boasts an impressive array of corporate sponsors.

According to his appearance on Gender Nebulous both Clifford Chance and JP Morgan have sponsored conferences /event venues.

Bobby’s own piece on the Trans In The City website shows an impressive array of contacts /supporters in his own right. Of course Stonewall, Diva appear as well as , shamefully, The Lesbian Visibility logo. However, Lesbian Visibility Week, in the U.K. , is the creature of Linda Riley who is Queen of the Vichy Lesbians.

Gender Nebulous Podcast /Youtube

Hosts: Victoria Hodges / Freda Wallace

Link To Gender Nebulous

Freda Wallace should,not need any introduction and I am not inclined to share the photo he posted from a Sex Dungeon, indulging in a sex act. Victoria can be found complaining about Center Parcs policy which decreed that men, who retain their penis, are not allowed to use the changing rooms for women and girls. Wallace is not the interviewer for this piece which was a solo spot for Hodges.

Pickard is not given to attacking “terfs” publicly or making the more outrageous statements. He’s a corporate man and knows how to moderate his tone to wield influence. He’s more likely to let his guard down when talking to other “trans” influencers. Hence this,on the Gender Nebulous podcast, where he can’t resist celebrating the (temporary) You Tube ban for Kellie J Keen.

In this podcast Bobbi talks about being a “trans” activist since the late 80’s, early 90’s and going to “trans” events across the country. It’s not clear what form this activism took, and whether it was merely cross-dressing events; certainly the events were described in terms more suggestive of social occasions, than protests.

Bobbi was on the organising commitee for Cheltenham Pride which attracted a who’s Who’ of Trans activists

In this segment some tension is revealed between Pickard’s organisation and Stonewall. It is alleged Stonewall claimed credit for a campaign that Pickard says originated with Trans In The City. It certainly seems to me that we need to make sure Stonewall don’t draw all the fire when this influential organisation seems to be flying under the radar.

Pickard is keen to emphasise their global reach which certainly seems more impressive than their accounts. (I will update when they submit their 2024 accounts which are due soon).

Pickard has been interviewed by Hodges in an earlier incarnation of his podcast called “Transclusive”. Pickard is very consistent about the role he sees himself playing to advance the rights of sex denialists.

Cool2Be Trans with Katie Neeve.

Katie is another heterosexual man and father who has been invited to represent women at the United Nations. Genevieve Gluck has a thread about “Katie” that provides a good introduction to who he is.

Katie Neeves

Bobbi opens with a story about his childhood and recalls his sitting under his mum’s (not the) ironing board wondering what he had done wrong because his mother didn’t buy him girl clothes and girl’s toys. He also recall, when he was five or six, going round to his nan’s house and raising the dressing up box for wigs and floaty clothes. His parents disapproved so he was reduced to dressing his action man in Barbie outfits. This was, he says, his true self that he was forced to hide away and the beginning of the self loathing and suicidal thoughts culminating in a night spent holding a knife to his throat at the age of 14. He finally “came out” age 48 having married and fathered kids in the meantime; his children are the reason why he wouldn’t change anything. This followed a reported suicide attempt after which he realised he had to “transition” or die. There follows a discussion where they both talk about how amazing gift that is “Gender Euphoria” .Both agree that they would not change their pasts.

Pickard then talks about setting up Trans in the City and coming out as the first “trans” person at BP, where he was a senior manager. The aim of Trans in The City was to get corporate sign up and at the time of this interview he claims to have 250 officially signed up and 300 unofficially aligned. Here is the list on their website today,

He then got involved in the campaign to reform the Gender Recognition Act . He noticed that, while there were excellent campaigns by Gendered Intelligence and Mermaids, there was nothing from the corporate world.

To this end Pickard talks about his role in instigating corporate backing. You will recall that women’s rights campaigners in effect stopped the introduction of Self-ID but Pickard and Neeves are claiming it as a victory for their side.

There follows a discussion about the lamentable situation for “trans” rights in the U.K. and how we are worse than Argentina. After “stopping the GRA” by which he means stopping any roll back of the existing protections for “gender reassignment” he then instigated the “Trans Rights Are Human Rights” campaign. We know, from above, that this was a joint campaign with Stonewall but he gives us a further insight into how that campaign came about. He intended it to counter the Women’s Rights campaigners who were talking “rubbish”. Of course he calls them “anti-trans” and has a sly dig at J.K Rowling.

He then credits Pedro Pino, of google.

He then explains that he was on a panel with Pino and he expressed his anger at the lack of concrete support from global corporates for “trans” rights. At the time Pino occupied a senior role at google. He has now moved onto YouTube.

Pino is a gay man who is completely signed up to the trans cult, here is is with the performative pronouns.

After sitting on a panel Pickard he connected Pickard with Stonewall.

Pino had history with Stonewall having partnered with them in the past.

Journalist, Jo Bartosch, spotted this extraordinary interference in U.K. domestic affairs in an article she penned in 2020.

Big Business and the GRA

Pickard then lists all the other corporates that have come on board with the “trans” agenda. It’s an impressive list.

Neeves then interjects to say he felt the turning point was when the British Army came on board and suggests this was a key lever to persuade Local Authorities to dispense with their fears this was too much of a political hot potato. Below Pickard confirms they have the support of the armed forces along with other corporate bodies.

Neves and Pickard then bask in the warm glow of all the support they have had since becoming full-time cross-dressers. They are certain that the vast majority of people are on their side and not the nasty feminists. They then talk about the need to educate people and how they forgive the clumsy language of neophytes, how noble!

Pickard then explains that this is a U.K specific issue (Go, Terf Island!) and that he runs courses all over the world, including the middle east, and encounters no resistance. (I assume he means countries that don’t allow women and homosexuals full human rights, so that should tell him something.). He is convinced that there only a tiny number of transphobes

You can support my work by taking out a paid subscription to my substack or donating below. All donations gratefully received and they do help me cover my costs and also to keep content open for those not able to contribute. I am in extra need this month after having paid £288 for my site, Only give if you can afford!

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

UN Women UK: Pickard 1

Featured

Bobbie Pickard 1

As part of my series on UN Women U.K. I am going to have a look at all the men who have been chosen as delegates to the United Nations at a conference to represent Women. First up is Bobbi Pickard. There is quite a lot to cover on Pickard so this will be Part One.

Pickard came out officially. as a faux woman, in 2017. He has been employed as a senior manager with British Petroleum for much of his career, either directly or as a self employed consultant. He is also CEO of Trans in the City which we will cover more in Part Two. According to his linkedin he has a HNC in Electrical Engineering. As you can see from the above profile he also has links with Stonewall. He was also appointed a trustee of Mermaids in May 2020.

According to Mermaid’s accounts he was not a trustee for long. (Note the two anonymous trustees.). His departure from Mermaids was for personal reasons related to him having genital surgery. He regards the ex CEO of Mermaids. Susie Green, as a personal friend,

Pickard is a heterosexual man who has fathered two children, although he now describes himself as a lesbian and if you don’t like it, you can mind your own business!

When I find late transitioning males, who are heterosexual and claim to be Lesbians, I generally look for reports of early cross dressing which is, almost invariably, present. Pickard is quite reticent about how his gender identity manifested itself, prior to deciding he was a woman. He is at pains to deny any link to fetish or a sexual motivation as illustrated by this, now deleted, comment 👇 on his website. He favours a medical explanation.

The deletion of the above 👆 is interesting. Having read many of these narratives the reference to cross dressing, sometimes with an acknowledgement of the sexual motive, is a recurrent theme. Pickard does admit to dressing up at his nan’s house as a five year old. However, Pickard also talks about an over bearing father, who was injured when Pickard was a small boy, and became mentally unstable. He also talks about the roots in trauma for a cross sex identification which could be a factor or an attempt at deflection. I have had long discussion with a detransitioned man whose motive to transition was rooted in childhood trauma so I would not totally dismiss this interpretation. In any case this is the less interesting part of Pickard’s story as I will demonstrate in part two.

Pickard does have a twitter account @BobbityP but is not very active. I am blocked but it seems to mainly consist of celebrating various awards from LGBTQ+ organisations and there does not seem to be India Willoughby levels of vitriol. He claims that he is a very contented in his “trans” identity but there is one slightly unhinged reaction to a Boots question. The levels of male entitlement and, frankly, insanity to object to being asked your sex. Your sex is a good indicator of the propensity to some diseases and the likely severity.

This is not a casual bit of snark. The NHS is capitulating to the sex denialism and this is doubly disadvantageous to women because the default medical research subject is male. Like it or not, SEX MATTERS, Yes, even in flu.

Disorders of Sexual Development/Intersex

The insistence on a biological reason for his being “trans” is a recurring theme in Pickard’s appearance in the media. He seems to rely on Anne Fausto-Sterling who famously said being “intersex” (not “transgender”) was as common as being a redhead. She also claimed there there were five biological sexes a claim that has been subject to, at a minimum, serious challenge. Pickard makes this claim in a discussion with Peter Tatchell.

Fausto-Sterling’s claims have been comprehensively debunked in this article by Leonard Sax.

Fausto-Sterling also later claimed that her insistence on five biological sexes was tongue in cheek in this exchange with biologist Colin Wright.

Pickard and Peter Tatchell.

It is worth watching the discussion with Tatchell, in full if only for this astonishing claim by Tatchell.

I am not going to spend too much time on Tatchell, for the purposes of this post, but I might add to my series on Tatchell which you can find here:👇

Peter Tatchell

He does deserve calling out this statement which attempts to paint feminists as the one unwilling to debate as if we don’t all recall that the #NoDebate hashtagcame from his side.

He will proceed to argue that those “trans” people who won’t debate are in fear for their safety; whilst not extending the same consideration to women. He also makes this statement before arguing that women are only partially oppressed on the basis of their sex. No, they are singled out more for their gender non-conformity which is, he thinks, why we should make common case with men who want to express themselves in stereotypical ways.🤷‍♀️

Pickard’s contribution is that he’s always been trans, has known since he was six. Since he partnered with a woman and had children, before coming out in 2017, I am a tad skeptical.

He then goes on to advance arguments about brain sex; female brain in a male body, then an appeal,to emotion that it was either “transition” or commit suicide. I won’t cover those arguments here because he repeats them in a one to one interview which I will cover next.

You can find this discussion here 👇

Peter Tatchell and Bobbi Pickard

Pickard interviewed by Emma Woollcott

Mishcon de Reya: An international Law Firm

Here is more information on Emma which contains the delicious irony that, among other things, she is head of reputation management and advises charities on reputational risk and data protection concerns. Think about this when they get on to discuss Pickard’s role as a Trustee of Mermaids!

I had a squint at Woollcott’s Linkedin and, of course she has pronouns in her bio and I could not resist adding this clip from her feed. Not only are women not just smaller men a massive bloke (or a small one) is never a woman! It’s is worth noting that Emma did an internship with the law firm Clifford Chance , who are themselves proponents of transgender ideology.

I will leave the revelations about the organisation Trans in The City until part two. I will cover Pickard’s theories about why he is “transgender” and his promotion of Mermaids.

Here is a link to the interview: 👇

Pickard interviews by a She /Her

Bearing in mind that this man goes into schools to promote his magical thinking.

Woollcott asks Pickard to describe his journey to coming out as transgender and why transgender people exist. She sets up the question by telling the viewer that he has done his research which lends a veneer of credibility to his theories. As above he goes the brain sex route:

I am highly skeptical about this claim after years of observing the hyper masculine behaviour of heterosexual men, who identify as women. There is research that suggest there are detectable brain differences between straight men and gay men so, those that don’t control for homosexuality are missing a confounding variable. Some studies also didn’t exclude the men who had taken cross sex hormones and did not allow for the impact of neuroplasticity. Could regular cos playing as women have had an impact on the brain due to neuroplasticity?. Reading the work of Dr Ann Lawrence, himself an autogynephilic male, also lead me to wonder if the sexual fantasies of those with autogynephilia also may have an impact on brain structure that is noting to do with female brains in male bodies.

You can read my series on Lawrence here:

Dr Ann Lawrence

Perhaps the stronger argument agains the prenatal hormone argument is identical twins where only one of them identifies as “transgender”. Based on my reading the result is higher than in non identical twins but nowhere near a 100% correlation.

I found his body language quite interesting at this point, looking down, fiddling with his hair and smirking. I would not be at all suprised if he doesn’t believe a word of it and this is an exhibition of dupers delight.

I find this argument, from Pickard, more plausible. A boy whose father suffered an injury and subsequent mental health issues at an impressionable age. Over identification with the mother, Perhaps the father was abusive to the boy, maybe even the mother. I could well imagine a rejection of being male when your own role model is so negative.

I was almost minded to sympathy at this point but the clear failure to identify with women’s concerns soon made me have a word with myself. Here he is on the proposed reform of the Gender Recognition Act. I have done a series on Gender Recognition Certificates this is fanciful nonsense. I also very much doubt so much political capital would have been expended on something that is “already the case”

You can read my series on Gender Recognition Certificates here: 👇

Gender Recognition Certificates

Where Pickard lost any goodwill I might have had was his schilling for Mermaids. The disgraceful lies about suicide which are easily debunked. Likewise the statement on puberty blockers, also easily disproved. 98% of those who start on puberty blockers, to block puberty from starting, progress to cross sex hormones. As a result they will be sterile and likely anorgasmic. Reminder that Pickard had children and, presumably a satisfactory sex life.

Those of us who have been writing about this for over six years can now point to the fact that puberty blockers are now banned, at least for under 16’s.

More on the most marginalised group, ever, in part two.

You can support my work by taking out a paid subscription to my substack or donating below. All donations gratefully received and they do help me cover my costs and also to keep content open for those not able to contribute. I have lots of renewals due soon for maintaining this site so donations would be particularly welcome. That said, don’t prioritise me over the many crowd funders we have at the moment and only consider it if you have spare cash.

My Substack

https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/STILLtish

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

Author: womangendercritical

Joanne (Pete) Lockwood

Like this:

Tweedale. Part 4!

Like this:

I’m better than you: Jordan Gray

Like this:

Eve Echo

Like this:

Gender Affirming Care: 2008

Like this:

Katie Neeves; UN Women

Like this:

Skye Morden: Policing Women

Like this:

Pippa Bunce: UN Women

Like this:

Un Women U.K. : Pickard 2

Like this:

UN Women UK: Pickard 1

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this:

Share this:

Like this: