Queering the NSPCC? FINAL

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children dates back well over a century. It was granted a Royal Charter, by Queen Victoria, in 1895. The NSPCC is the only UK charity which has been granted statutory powers under the Children Act 1989, allowing it to apply for care and supervision orders for children at risk. Childline, the charity founded by Esther Rantzen, became part of the NSPCC in 2006.

After looking at the ChildLine Content on Porn; I was moved to examine their other content. I focussed specifically on LGBTQ+ content and you can find these blogs all headed Queering the NSPCC.

In summary the Lesbian content is extremely limited. Where two females are included the word Lesbian seems to be verboten. Even the Gay males, who do get more coverage, seem obliged to reference the fluidity of their sexual orientation, identify as Queer but avoid any expression of an, exclusively, same sex orientation.

Here is a summary of their content and how much time it devotes to sexual orientation. I have been very generous in assigning the label Lesbian to the two I cover here. They are clearly female couples but do not mention the word Lesbian. Two of the posts left me in doubt about the sexuality of the interviewees. Asexual, we are told, covers 1% of the population and yet is given two YouTubes. Trans coverage is given 21% of the content and all the LGBTQ+ invariably foregrounds the T. The content for Gay males is higher but many pay lip service to the idea of Gendered Attraction, as opposed to being confident in proclaiming their exclusive sexual attraction to biological men.

Here is a spreadsheet of all the content with some notes, where appropriate. NSPCC Content

Below the NSPCC endorses controversial charity Mermaids which advocates for “Trans Kids”, campaigns for earlier medical intervention, and suggests children struggling with Gender Identity issues need to be safeguarded from parents. Mermaids think any parent who fails to agree their child is #BornInTheWrongBody is abusive and places their child in danger of suicide. They do this by referencing extremely dubious statistics. 👇 Suicide in the Trans Community

Do the NSPCC also agree with this characterisation of, parents of kids with Gender Dysphoria, as abusive if they dont’ medicalise? Their content is replete with the notion that sex is merely “assigned at birth” and they are confident signposting children to Mermaids.

They are also meeting with Stonewall. Once a venerable advocate for Gay rights. Now in total thrall to the Trans Lobby. Peter Wanless is the head of the NSPCC and Gender Identity Ideology has been peddled to vulnerable kids on his watch. 👇

I also had a delve into any content about women’s rights and unearthed this content. Even in content about women we are obliged to pay homage to the idea of Self-Identifying Women/Men. Abject nonsense about “people with periods”.

Queer Theory in Practice.

The NSPCC have also received some media coverage today for a Nude Family Swim which is an event at Waterworld in Stoke. Apparently the NSPCC were involved in developing the Safeguarding policy. I wish we lived in a world where childhood innocence was protected but it is naive to, implicity, endorse activities such as these 👇

Archive link to the article https://archive.is/3oJcl

I doubt I would have been moved to look at the NSPCC were it not for the responses they issued to people raising concerns about some disturbing social media activity by one of their employees. Full Story is below.

This story of James Making, a former employee, of the NSPCC until he was eventually Let Go is illustrative of how far this charity has lost its way, James was responsible for the short-lived role of Munroe Bergdorf, a trans activist, at the NSPCC. He then became known for more notorious activities at his place of work. This one story ought to have been a wake up call for the NSPCC but I fear they are unable to change course. I include this woeful tale because it is indicative of how the adoption of Gender Identity Ideology and the obsession with LGBTQ+ has clouded the Charity’s judgement. When you make any community into a modern day “Priest class” your critical faculties become dimmed.

James Making & Munroe Bergdorf

I began to look at the NSPCC following an incident involving an employee who clearly stated his employer on his Social Media accounts. He then posted footage of himself masturbating, in leather fetish gear, at work. Not content with this he added a clear statement that he was doing this at a Children’s Charity. Clearly this detail about the context was intended to further titillate his audience.

James was the NSPCC employee responsible for hiring a Transgender model/ activist as an advocate for the charity. Munroe had previously lost other roles after previous social media activity came to light. L’oréal, The Labour Party & the BFI were three such roles. Once the NSPCC post was announced the public backlash began. Munroe presents a highly sexualised image of what they believe to be female presenting. Potentially more worrying were public invitations for troubled children to contact them directly. As many people pointed out this showed a naïveté about safeguarding children. The model had posed for playboy, and solicited messages from “transkids”

The unsuitability of this role model is amply illustrated here 👇

Munroe also posted some invitations for children to contact them directly, via social media, in an ill-advised approach to #ChildSafeguarding.

The NSPCC dispensed shed with Munroe’s services, not without a hint of denial about their role, despite having publicly announced it.

Later they would issue a grovelling apology, to Munroe, for the manner of the sacking.

Here is the statement 👇

When the masturbatory antics of Mr Making were revealed the NSPCC’s Immediate response, astonishingly, was to berate people for raising concerns! It also accused them displaying homophobia and attacking their staff. Other high profile Guardian writers joined in 👇

So let me reiterate. A man was posting, publicly, video of himself masturbating on the premises of a Charity, whose remit is to protect children. Observers had no means of determining his sexuality, His actions were raising red flags all over the place.🚩

You can read more on this, by Jo Bartosch here

Here are a couple of clips from that article and one (censored) from the post made by Mr Making.

The NSPCC remained silent for some time until it emerged that the employee had been sacked.

The NSPCC openly proclaims that it’s priority is their LGBTQ credentials. My reading of their content shows they are committed to the Q at the expense of the rights of people who fought to gain legal protections for their sexual orientation.

Lesbians? Not so much.

Queering the NSPCC? Part 10: Heteronormativity

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children dates back well over a century. It was granted a Royal Charter, by Queen Victoria, in 1895. The NSPCC is the only UK charity which has been granted statutory powers under the Children Act 1989, allowing it to apply for care and supervision orders for children at risk. Childline, the charity founded by Esther Rantzen, became part of the NSPCC in 2006.

What does Heteronormativity & Heterosexuality mean?

This episode features an interview with Calum McSwiggan who we met earlier in Queering the NSPCC? Part Three.

Calum is a Gay male, here he is in conversation with Beckii, a young woman whose sexuality is not made explicity. Here they team up to teach us the meaning of “heteronormativity” and “heterosexual”.

You can watch it Here

You can read a transcript here: Challenging Heteronormativity Child Line

First off. Its not a bad idea to challenge assumptions that *everybody* is heterosexual. There is every chance a kid who doesn’t perform sex sterotypical behaviours is not heterosexual. I don’t propose to expound on whether this is hard-wired, #BornThisWay, or nurture. It is, however, one of the earliest signs a kid will grow up Gay. This early sign allows parent’s, like me, to signal acceptance in a number of ways. For me, I always talked about futher relationships in terms of “she” or “he” so my son knew this was perfectly acceptable and supported by his parents. So, on the face of it, challenging heteronormativity is no bad thing.

The conversation explores the impact of expectations of heterosexuality on kids who have a sense they are different / don’t conform to gendered expectations for their sex. One of the main concerns with this topic is the conflation of early signs of future homosexuality with being “trans”. The interviewer does this early on with the statement below. Here an effeminate boy, or a masculine female, immediately calls into question, not just their sexuality, but their sex/trans status. It is this way of thinking that can have a disastrous impact on the gay community. What could be more “heteronormative” than equating same sex orientation with the idea that you may just be “trans”. If an effeminate boy, attracted to males, is really a woman does that not make him straight? Is this not the ultimate in elevating the new version of heterosexual as the “norm”?

Calum continues the theme. “We’re brought up in a society where you are kind of expected to be cisgender, you are expected to be heterosexual”. What he fails to see is that Gender Identity ideology puts a massive question mark over the sex of, gender non-conforming, Gay males and Lesbians. Even though we know this behaviour is one of the earliest clues someone may grow up homosexual, we are offering the alternative narrative they may be #BornWrong. How is that progress?

I have written about this many times here is one piece The Woke Gay Conversion Therapy?

I have also written about a project funded by the Government Equality Office which illustrates how this approach is being used in Primary Schools. That Equaliteach Project

Another common theme, on my blog, is the impact on child safeguarding. Anyone following my work will know I have a Gay son who also has Gender Identity issues. As a school boy he did not use girls spaces. (He still doesn’t). His circle of friends was wholly female. When sleepovers became a feature, of these friendships, he was excluded. His exclusion was the parents prerogative. It was never driven by unkindness. They had daughters and they did not know my son. We both respected the parent’s decisions. He was included in one sleepover and he was delighted. The parents knew him and it was their decision. I am not going to lie, I secretly had a bit of a cry when he was invited. However an individual invitation should not translate into blanket inclusion. It should not be a default expectation. (Fun fact. He was 11 and those, sugar and spice, girls sent him home with manually pierced ears!)

Anyway, I digress, Gemma here doesn’t get #ChildSafeguarding and, by extension, neither do #ChildLine . This is not about heteronormativity it’s about girls’ rights to set boundaries and not to be shamed about necessary exclusions. 👇

Again one of the central difficulties is that we are telling people that you can neither tell anyone’s sexuality or gender by the way they present themselves. This is problematic for all sorts of reasons, and not true, wholly, in either case. Gaydar is a thing and thank goodness it is for the dating ability of Gay Males and Lesbians. Detecting biological sex is also hard-wired and doesn’t change because of the massive strides in surgical mimicry.

I watched two gay men discussing this on Arty Morty’s youtube. Duncan, a gay man, tells a tale about identifying the one other gay man in a nightclub before either of them were out. Calum here is being disingenuous.

Closely followed by Gemma who extends this to deny we have any ability to correctly “gender” people. Er. We can sex them though!

This is duplicitous stuff. We don’t just detect sex for mating purposes. Women detect males because it has a huge impact on how we manage our safety in certain settings. This ideology tells us a) that it is bigotry to recognise biological reality b) tells us we have to accept bearded males as females and even lesbians! Cue Alex Drummond.

Stonewall Ambassador! 👇

Alex has delivered school talks about being a Lesbian! This is Gaslighting!

I too would like to see some understanding of different sexualities and family structures. The fact remains that most people live in heterosexual couples. It cannot be beyond our wit to make sure that children know there are different family structures. Not all of the children will end up in heterosexual relationships. I have no objection to this being signalled, even in primary school. This would allow chidren who may already have pre-sexual, innocent crushes, on the same sex, feel “normal”. We don’t have to wage a culture war on heterosexual norms just because heterosexual relationships are the majority.

You will not achieve acceptance for one sexuality if you attack another’s as somehow “invalid”. It really isn’t a good tactic. The sex denialism in Gender Identity Ideology is unmoored from biological reality and sexual desire. There is a conflict with the protection of women’s rights to sex segregated spaces and the right to be exclusively same sex attracted. The sooner politicians and Gay Rights Activists wake up to this the better.

We risk reversing progress made over 30 years!

Donate

If you want to support my work here is my paypal. Please only do so if you can afford. Any amount will help. tishnaught@me.com

£3.00

Queering the NSPCC? Part 9: Asexuality

The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children dates back well over a century. It was granted a Royal Charter, by Queen Victoria, in 1895. The NSPCC is the only UK charity which has been granted statutory powers under the Children Act 1989, allowing it to apply for care and supervision orders for children at risk. Childline, the charity founded by Esther Rantzen, became part of the NSPCC in 2006.

Coming out as Asexual!

The NSPCC/ChildLine content manages to have two young women who come out as Asexuals. Their content seems to have no space for Lesbians/Gay males unless a) they don’t mention the word Lesbian b) they identify as Queer and acknowledge the fluidity of sexual attraction. Yet this niche identity (asexual) is given two out of the 24 videos on LGBTQ+ content.

Here is a transcript which covers both videos: Asexuality on Childline Yasmin and Amelia

You can watch them here: Yasmin and Amelia here.

Yasmin talks us through the trauma of multiple exits from the closet and the need to educate the bemused recipients of the asexual announcements. People have a lot of controversial opinions about Yasmin’s experience and seem a tad confused. I am not sure what Yasmin has, or has not, done to generate this confusion. Apparently ChildLine seem to think this is a pressing issue to cover so they have helpfully signposted more content on asexuality to clear up any confusion.

Amelia tells us that she also got confused after all the ~~interrogation,~~ oops reasonable questions, that came her way. This is the logical conclusion of the Queer take-over of, once venerable, Gay Rights organisations. Pretty much everyone fits under the Queer umbrella these days. These new identities are an insult to the very real fight to get legal protections for Sexual orientation.

Another recurrent feature of the ChildLine content is the reckless promotion of YouTube content. Narcissists are ten a penny on YouTube. They make their money by attracting viewers, likes and sensational/ pseudo edgy content. For many of them this is their bread and butter and the content is carefully curated to stay relevant. Not once, in all the LGBTQ+ content, on the ChildLine YouTube, do they offer any words of caution about the content providers they profile. It is reckless to use Social Media Influencers in this way. Their raison d’etre is not Child Safeguarding, it’s maintaining audience, influence and revenue. This is not compatible with what SHOULD be the aims of ChildLine/NSPCC.

Yasmin’s contribution is, however, nothing compared to the self-absorbed contribution from Amelia. Adolescents, or immature adults, setting themselves up as self-appointed experts, are simply not equipped to give good advice to children /teens. Amelia is also asexual. Below is a long excerpt to give you an idea of the word salad being dished out to gullible children. What a load of (Judith) Butler Bollox. 👇👇

Obfuscation masquerading as Education!

“So, asexuality like a lot of things to do with gender and sexuality, is something of a spectrum. Asexual is an identity on it’s own, but it’s also an umbrella term or, erm, like a spectrum term for a wider group who have similar experiences. There’s demisexuality and grey-asexuality or greysexuality, and these are both identities that fall under the asexual umbrella. Demisexuality is somebody who doesn’t experience sexual attraction until there’s a strong emotional bond formed. And this isn’t the same thing as like waiting till marriage or something. It’s about not feeling sexual attraction until you are entirely comfortable with someone.”

I predict a great career in Academia for Amelia. Watch out Sally Hines! The next generation is snapping at your heels.

Here is Amelia on Grey-sexuality. I am almost too bored to attempt to define grey-sexuality/grey-asexuality. Seems some people, who fall under the “ACE” umbrella, experience little or no sexuality. Even when they do experience it they may not be able to summon the energy/ inclination to act up on it. This might describe every mum with a new baby / toddler but we just called it “knackered” .

In another revealing quote Amelia seems unable/unwilling to give an honest reflection on what underpins SEXual attraction. In the world of multiple “Gender Identities” , it is an unpardonable offence to acknowledge biological sex. Here is Amelia on sexual attraction 👇Can’t say I have ever fallen in love with a voice but I am sure there is a sexual identity, to cover this, on its way. We could nominate Louis Armstrong for this one.

Lest you confuse asexuality, with people not having sex, Amelia is careful to explain that some asexual people do have relationships and sexual relationships, presumably in an asexual way. Fair play to anyone who can sustain a libido faced with this level of self-absorption!
Do not let our legislators accept this absolutely incoherent ideology as a basis for law.

Fuck The Wokerati; The Surrendered Polyamorous; The Don’t Fuck Me Pumps wearing; The Educate Yourself crowd have destroyed any joy in sexuality. Of any orientation or none.

Donate

If you want to support my work here is my paypal. Please only do so if you can afford. Any amount will help. tishnaught@me.com

£3.00

Queering the NSPCC? Part 8: Sexual Identity and Gender Identity

Steph on Sexuality and Gender Identity.

This is a companion piece to my previous blog on content by ChildLine. I was curious to look at what content kids would encounter if they followed Steph on their main account. You can read the previous blog, on Steph here.

For those of us with children, caught up in this, it is really important to understand the evolution of this ideology and how it has been fostered in our young. ChildLine, as it turns out, is relentless in peddling Gender Ideology, under the badge of LGBTQ+ content. Our same sex attracted youth are therefore getting signposted to Transgender content, relentlessly, as I hope I have shown in this series on the NSPCC.

Steph has been given a public platform to explain their experience of being Transgender. I have expressed my misgivings about ChildLine using Social Media influencers in this way. They may be able to control the content on their channel (which is, in my view, bad enough) but where is the due diligence on content only be a few clicks away? Curious or confused children/teens will explore the content of the contributors.

This is a transcript; which is based on various vidoes on Steph’s YouTube channel: Steph Kyriacou discusses sexuality

This is a public figure, by virtue of the NSPCC/ChildLine connection, and their own social media presence. It is important that people are able to examine the thought processes underpinning Gender Identity Ideology. Put crudely this is the idea some people are #BornInTheWrongBody. I regard this generation of Social Media advocates as victims of the same ideology using them as mouth pieces. I have nothing but compassion for the young women, and men, caught up in this belief system. However those in Senior roles, at the NSPCC, are entirely culpable for the, uncritical, dissemination of Gender Identity Ideology, to vulnerable children/teens.

Am I bisexual?

First up are some quotes from this YouTube video from August 2019. Am I bisexual?

In this post, Steph acknowledges a struggle to accept their same sex attraction when they identified as a Lesbian. Now, a post Testosterone, post double mastectomy, self-identified man, they find themselves also attracted to “men” and struggling to come out.

So, we have a clear acknowledgment they struggled to accept their same sex attraction. There is a rather moving post about how their, Greek Orthodox, grandparents accepted them coming out as a Transgender man. Yet no parallel “coming out” story, as a Lesbian, to relatives,

A later clip from that same video explains that Steph is now struggling to accept their attraction to “men”. They made this announcement on Bi-Visibility Day. Multiple “coming outs” are a feature of many of the young Social Influencers who’s content seems mainly driven adopting new “identities”. or Sexualities.

Trans Firsts!

Here is some of Steph’s content, from September 2018, on Trans Firsts: https://youtu.be/7v6E1gkVFtU

Influenced by YouTube content, Steph went ahead and bought their first binder. In secret. Without telling another soul. Bearing in mind that the NSPCC is promoting this YouTuber and it only took me a couple of clips to access all Steph’s on line content. Other low points are a product review for “packers” i.e. a prosthetic penis which, they advise their younger viewers, are available from Sex Shops. Below is another common occurrence. The YouTubers often reference other prominent “trans guys” and how much influence they had on their own “journey”.

Dating as a Trans Guy!

Next up, also from September 2018, is a post on Dating as a Trans Guy: https://youtu.be/D0ezulmqhvg

Here are some quotes. I had to condense some of the comments but the original content is linked above so you can see I have not distorted the intent.

An unexpected development, as Steph explains, is the change to their, perceived, dating pool since coming out as a man.

I will return to the above interpretation in an earlier YouTube, by Steph.

Here Steph re-calibrates who is expected to be in their dating pool. Before identifying as a man heterosexual females were accepted as being off limits. Steph listed the multiple ways females are now identifying. Lesbians, Pan (sexual) girls, bi (sexual) girls, queer girls etc. However Steph always believed “straight” girls were off limits, until they were a “Man”.

Unlike the many male, often fully male-bodied, “Lesbians” ; who feel entitled to be in a Lesbian dating pool, Steph, now embraces? accepts? being excluded by females who are attracted to females.

This would almost be a refreshing change, if Trans-Identified males accepted their exclusion from Lesbian dating pools. What is absolutely heart-breaking is a same sex attracted female doing a reverse #CottonCeiling and prioritising their gender identity over their sex, and sexual attraction.

Steph, in this video, has a revelation about the new inclusion of straight girls in their dating pool. Its astonishing how dismissive this movement is about sexual orientation whether gay, lesbian or hetereosexual. The tone in which the “whatever, you do you, date whoever you want” has a, not so subtle, under-current of disdain for the bigotted, dick loving, straight girls.

Guess what Steph? You don’t get to decide who includes you in their dating pools. You might well find yourself excluded from Lesbian dating preferences. They love women and you are in flight from your sex and, seemingly, your sexual orientation. Personally I would exclude any male who remains heterosexual but wishes to identify as a woman. I don’t want anyone in flight from their sex in my sex life! Or anyone who fetishises my own sex, but that’s a different story.

Drunk Chat : Two Trans Guys!

Next up is from March 2017. https://youtu.be/aF-PCVqUV68 Steph and another “trans guy” are having a bit of a drunk chat about some of their social experiences and being mis-identified. I assume the intermittent burping is based on an assumption that this is what boys do? (I mean, they might but it looks a little bit performative to me…) . This video explicity tells you that you can try to teach a “Cis-Person “the right way of thinking”. Yes they really did say this. If the Cis-Person doesn’t learn and respect your identity then, apparently, you can tell them to Fuck Off! I don’t think there is any self-awareness that redefining the rest of the population as “Cis” is hardly a marker of respect for who we are….Just ARE. Not something we identify as….

This was what triggered the backlash against the Cis Community.. Somebody mistook them for Lesbians and Women. Oh The HORROR!

Coming Out via a Revolving Door!

Next up is from January 2017 and is a retrospective review of Steph’s , multiple, coming out stories. https://youtu.be/HZLKBjxzkB8

Steph had crushes on girls but did not really understand this was what they were. At age 16 they started to get asked questions from their friends about their sexuality. Friends began asking them if they were “bisexual” . Steph, at this point, is adamant that they were in fact straight. This was a very emphatic statement no doubt reflective of the lack of acceptance, in her school that Steph highlights.

Here Steph acknowledges her struggle to accept her Lesbian sexuality at age 16. This is still such a difficult time for young people; who can be aware of being different long before understanding their sexual orientation. While Stonewall are busy, chasing the Trans Dollar, they are ignoring the homophobia, which never went away. It is still incredibly difficult to come to terms with same sex attraction. Those of us with gay offspring know this. We would have welcomed better sex education in school to foster acceptance of different sexual orientations. However this opportunity has been squandered because of the nefarious inclusion of “Gender Identity Ideology”. The new sex education is actively harmful for our gay youth. I would go to prison before I would accept the compulsory indoctrination of our kids in Queer Theory. Here is some research on the negative impact of homophobia on Gender Identity.

Homophobic Bullying & Gender Identity

As you can see above. Steph followed a familiar path in first identifying as Bisexual and then finally acknowledging their exclusive sexual attraction to females. HALLELULAH!

It did not last long, sadly. Steph gives us a detailed, if somewhat convoluted, explanation about ditching the label Gay Woman to identify as non-binary. This was a stepping stone to identifying as Queer; because if you don’t identify with either sex how can you be homosexual?

Next up in the mulitple identity disorders, Steph finally identifies as a Trans Man.

As Steph says, they have come out multiple times over the period of six years. The final irony is, in order to embrace their same sex orientation, they identify as a man attracted to other men. It turns out this includes transmen. Hey presto. You can identify as a gay man, keep your queer label and choose someone from the same sex as your partner. Turns out this is exactly what Steph did. Acknowledged their attraction to male, met a boy they liked. Boy then became their boyfriend. I had a look and the new boyfriend was another YouTuber, Nate, who is also a trans man.

We are through the looking glass.

Donate

If you want to support my work here is my paypal. Please only do so if you can afford. Any amount will help. tishnaught@me.com

£3.00

Queering the NSPCC? Part 7: Trans Identity

Trans Identity : Steph

You can watch it here

You can read a transcript here Trans Identity Steph

Here Steph talks, to Cora, about the need for Trans Visibility and the difficulties of being “trans” . These were highlighted by a list of perceived injustices and lots of instructions about how to be a Trans Ally. The abuse that Steph relates is focussed on being perceived as female and treated accordingly. This is an important point. Recognition of biological reality is not a learned prejudice. It’s hard-wired. It’s evolutionary. It’s not akin to racial prejudice or other socialised bigotry. It’s a basic recognition system. This is how Steph defines transphobic behaviour. 👇

The interviewer responds with statistical reports of how unsafe “trans” people feel at school. If this includes “misgendering” calling it abuse is a stretch. At this stage school children are not going to be on cross-sex hormones (normally) under the age of 16. Hence females who wish to be recognised, as male, are demanding we validate an identity at odds with biological reality/appearance.

Whilst many people argue we should just #BeKind, because this is just simple courtesy, in reality we are asked for a lot more than maintaining a polite fiction. The nature of these demands soon becomes more explicit. Steph regards sex segregated spaces as an affront to their identity. Therefore they demand that the privacy and dignity of both sexes should be sacrificed to appease a tiny minority, who feel at odds with their biological sex. I would suggest it is no accident that a member of the female sex is presenting this argument. We all know these arguments sound very different when the advocate is a pre-op male. Once again #SexMatters and this is the reason a female person, is frequently wheeled out to demand that women & girls give up our boundaries.

Steph is typical of proponents of Gender Ideology who constantly intones some version of “Educate Yourself” . We have heard this many times so guess what Steph? We did exactly that and what we learned did not reassure us. Not. One. Iota.

This is a rather gentle introduction which begins with a suggestion that any re-education begins gently.. but “and then if they refuse to listen, you can just block them”

It is well worth counting up how many times we are enjoined to educate ourselves; whilst being presented with incoherent narratives to explain what being Transgender encompasses. Some people may identify as male or female. Some identify as neither. Some move between male and female and are Gender Fluid. Some will have surgery and hormones, others either or neither. We are being asked to believe six impossible things before breakfast.

Not content with proselytising this ideology personally Steph also demands State sponsored “education” which inculcates children in Gender Identity Ideology.

In fact transgender guidance packs are being rolled out to most schools. Yet so many of them have been removed because they have been found to be unlawful, particularly around legal duties under the , legally, protected characteristic of Sex. It is concerning to see the NSPCC endorsing this ideology and completely ignoring the significant impact on the rights of girls.

Already Local Authorities have been forced to withdraw the guidance they have been placing in schools. Warwickshire, Cornwall, Shropshire, Barnsley are just a few of the councils who have withdrawn their guidance. This followed complaints/ Legal Challenge. Organisations like Safe Schools Alliance and Transgender Trend have been at the forefront of challenging this guidance. I have read multiple packs myself and wrote this blog about how they treat parents. Putting the Loco in Loco Parentis. Cannot stress enough to CHECK THE SCHOOL GUIDANCE.

Another striking , and worrying, aspect of the ChildLine YouTube are the alerts to what they believe is related /appropriate content.

Here Steph talks about being in an environment, where they are not respected and understood. The context is not honouring preferred pronouns and Gender Identity. What pops as suggested content? An article about suicide by another ChildLine Contributor. The use of the suicide narrative is a deeply problematic aspect of the campaigns for “Transgender Children’s” rights. I have written about this here. Suicide in the Trans Community

Here is another link to suggested content. 👇

We have already established the low bar for defining things as “Transphobic” but here ChildLine suggests content on dealing with “Hate Crime”. The afore-mentioned School packs on “Transgender Guidance” are also overly keen to badge benign comments as Hate Crimes and some even include a form to facilitate reporting staff and pupils to the police! In the guidance written for Cornwall the pack is even co-written with a serving Police Officer & Transphobia is highlighted as a crime! 👇

Here the ChildLine lines up more content on Transgender Issues. These signpost medical transition for non-binaries and one promotes access to Puberty Blockers.

I covered Alex Bertie and Charlie Martin, talking about Puberty in an earlier part of my series on NSPCC/ChildLine Content. On Steph’s personal YouTube account we learn it was Alex Bertie who first attracted Steph to binding their breasts. Alex Bertie was also promoting a specific brand , of binder, on their youtube account.

This content I also covered. Fox Fisher is a well known Trans Activist. Mr Lewzer is a trans-identifying female who has a following for comedic content; where they pose as their bearded mother. I know from my own offspring that Mr Lewzer’s content is very popular with Gender Confused teens.

My next piece will be a look at the belief system of this ChildLine contributor. The NSPCC seems to have a strategy of harnessing the Social Media presences of these young people. Unfortunately many of them have content that is deeply damaging to confused children /teens. Indeed many of the ones with Gender Identity Issues appear to have significant struggles of their own. Children are being directed to content which seems to immerse them in the topic. Nowhere does the NSPCC. raise concerns /flag that YouTube content is not always a reliable source. In fact, many of their interviewees sing the praises of YouTube content. This is not entirely surprising since many of them make money, even a living out of their content.

Donate

If you want to support my work here is my paypal. Please only do so if you can afford. Any amount will help. tishnaught@me.com

£3.00

Queering the NSPCC? Part 6: Pansexual

What does it mean to be Pansexual?

This episode features an interview with Gemma here to educate us about pansexuality.

You can watch it here

You can read a transcript Pan Sexuality Gemma NSPCC

As far as I can ascertain pansexual is a Woke version of bisexual designed to elide the “sex” in sexual and divorce it from sexual attraction. In the grand scheme of things this, I assume, makes no difference to bisexuals, who are attracted to both sexes. Where it becomes problematic is the idea that same sex orientation (a legally protected characteristic in the U.K.) is somehow outdated and insufficiently inclusive of anyone of the opposite sex. It seems designed to mandate inclusion of anyone who has a “Gender Identity” at odds with their biological sex. Anyone paying attention will know that activists frequently describe exclusive same sex orientation as “transphobic”. See #CottonCeiling and, latterly #BoxerCeiling. The creeping invalidation of exclusion, on the grounds of sex, has a particular resonance for the Gay community who have only recently, 2010 in the UK, achieved their legally protected status.

The framing of the discussion is interesting. First of all Gemma explains what pansexuality means.👇 As you can see there are no exclusions from Genma’s dating pool. She includes everyone. Regardless of sex, or presentation.

The next sentence implies some moral superiority to Gemma’s stance with this glib statement. Gemma has an all-seeing ability to see beyond such superficial fripperies of biological sex to the essence of what a person is. Whatever that means! The implication is that people operating a dating pool based on sexual orientation are somehow basing this on surface level judgements. This is the subtle shaming at play.

This professed ability, expressed by a young woman, could merely be dismissed as the righteousness of naive youth. Unfortunately it has infected our body politic as demonstrated by Pansexual Layla, recent candidate for the Leadership of the Liberal Democrat’s and also a pansexual. Here’s Layla on her stance on access to single sex spaces. You can find this clip on Hansard (A written record of U.K parliamentary proceedings.)

Next up Poppy repeats another fallacy; which is propagated relentlessly in this “debate”. The idea that science has discovered some new facts that prove Humans are not sexually dimorphic is pure propaganda.

Nothing has changed Poppy! Except the emergence of an ideology predicated on convincing society the shape shifting idea of “Gender” has to take primacy over Biological Sex. Claire Ainsworth’s article is routinely quoted to argue that biological sex has been debunked, Here is what she had to say along with a similiar statement by Professor Curtis.

At the risk of repeating myself, here is the result of research into the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in referrals to Gender Identity clinics. They are not a statistically, significant feature and hence routine karyotype tests, to determine chromosomal abnormalities, were abandoned some years ago.

If anyone wants to know why “intersex” conditions or, Differences/Disorders of sexual development, figure so prominently in this discussion I cover it in this blog; based on the work of an autogynephilic (AGP) transsexual. The argument centres on a psychological need for AGP males to claim a biological basis for their condition, a sort of “intersex brain”. It drove the diagnostic criteria for Gender Dysphoria and is, in my view. key to understanding the landscape and the trans activists mind set.

This is why young activists make nonsensical claims such as these 👇.

If it was just a bunch of young people spouting this, and it wasn’t influencing laws /public policy, I could be sanguine about the folly of youth. I used to like the Bay City Rollers. Unfortunately this type of thinking is now widespread across our media and has a footing in every political party.

So where did Gemma come across the term pansexual asks Poppy. To no great surprise, here is her answer.

I will accept all and every criticism that I am being a bit ageist in my dismissal of Generation Gemma. I am. Gemma has a benevolent ageism of her own going on. After providing us with her understanding of the development of the nomenclature from bisexual to pansexual, Gemma offers a dispensation for anyone to choose which label suits them or to reject them all (How Generous!). Though you may need to use the term bisexual to explain it to parents and grandparents because “I think it’s easier for them to understand and grasp”. Gee, thanks for thinking of us! Is this what’s known as an unreaonable adjustment? Not patronising at all.

No interview on this topic would be complete without reference to living authentically, bullying, and the need to keep safe. If anyone has any statistics the pansexual murder rate, do let me know. Gemma also recommends joining your local LGBT group (I would avoid at all costs for any kid confused about their sexuality.). ChildLine are also recommended, as you would expect. If I have not convinced you to avoid like the plague, by now, one of us has failed.

Donate

If you want to support my work here is my paypal. Please only do so if you can afford. Any amount will help. tishnaught@me.com

£3.00

Queering the NSPCC? Part Five: Trans Puberty Myths

Trans Puberty Myths

This episode features an interview with Charlie Martin, who is an adult transitioner, YouTuber and racing driver. Alongside Charlie is Alex Bertie, who is also YouTuber who covered their transition on line.

You can watch it Here

You can read a transcript here: Trans Puberty Myths

Right off the bat the intervewer uses the phrase “Gender assigned at birth”. Once again! Nobody is assigned a Gender at birth. Sex is observed and recorded. The number of people, where there is any ambiguity , necessitating an “assigned sex” is infinitesimally small. These are people with differences/disorders of sexual development (DSDs), sometimes referred to as Intersex. The latter nomenclature has fallen out of favour because it others sufferers as somehow outside of the sex binary. In fact the various conditions are all associated with either the male or female sex.

To provide further clarity it is important that people avoid confusing people with DSDs with people who reject their birth sex. The rate of chromosomal abnormalities in the trans community is no more significant than in society at large. Research conducted, in the U.K. , resulted in the abandonment of Karyotype tests, to identify these conditions, in referrals to Gender Identity Clinics.. Quote below 👇. Full article Here

The interviewer commences by highlighting how puberty is worse for “trans” people. At face value this seems a reasonable assumption. Presumably, if you believe you are about to enter a “wrong puberty” it could exacerbate pubertal distress, or, arguably, displace it. I would have liked to have seen more emphasis on the fact that struggling with a female puberty is hardly rare. Dealing with the onset of menstruation/ budding breasts is a difficult time for *ALL* females. It is perfectly normal to struggle with puberty and to feel at odds with your sexed body. This cannot be over-emphasised. I have seen more than one de-transitioned female wish they had known this was something many other girls experienced.

The interviewer is also dangerously quick to highlight that blocking puberty is an option. Additionally, after this statement, 👇 they even highlight options to change GP if they are not sympathetic (acquiescent?) with access medical intervention. We are not talking about smarties here! This is a very serious medical intervention with irreversible consequences.

Neither Alex or Charlie had their puberty blocked, Alex presents puberty blocking drugs as something you can simply stop taking and changes will resume. In fact virtually all children put on puberty blockers don’t go back, they invariably progress to cross sex hormones. This is a medical experiment. We have never before blocked a natural puberty in its entirety.

Both Charlie and Alex are keen to dispel any connection between your “gender” and your sexuality. Both profess to be fluid about their sexual orientation according to their YouTube channels. Alex presents an episode on whether they are Gay. Starts off identifying as bisexual because they had dated males and females. They then had a long relationship with a girl so identified as a Lesbian. Once they discovered their trans identity they briefly identified as straight. They then reverted to bisexual until they discovered pansexual. (Attraction to all “genders” and more politically acceptable than implying sex plays a role in your attraction). Here is the YouTube: Am I gay?

Alex seems to have had one long relationship with another trans man i.e. a female. Latterly, post testosterone & double mastectomy they report dating “cis guys” . Interestingly they seem to only lose the power of speech around an attractive girl. Here is a link to their YouTube where they talkabo ut their experience on Grindr, a dating site for homosexual males. Alex reports having the weird experience of being asked about their genitals by Gay men. I remember the days when we used to think it was “weird” for females to assume gay men should include them in their dating pools. Link here. I’m Dating

Charlie Martin’s YouTube is similarly of a sexually fluid nature. Pre-Sexual Reassignment surgery they report only being attracted to “girls”. Post SRS they report that their sexual encounters, so far, had been with males. This is not uncommon in later transitioners with a background (and present) in stereotypically masculine pursuits. Early reports of validation by men flirting with Charlie, as a women, are not uncommon in this section of the Trans community. There is a fine line between needing validation , as a woman, and re-orienting your sexuality around that need, Could that explain the fluid sexuality?

The reiterated claim that gender is entirely disconnected from your sexuality suits a particular trans-narrative. 👇. It seems harmless until it challenges same sex orientation and the idea that restricting your dating pool to your own sex is “transphobic” . If you are unfamiliar with this idea search #CottonCeiling. There used to be a straight male joke about really being a “Lesbian”. Sadly this is now a common feature on Lesbian dating apps who are awash with Zero Effort Trans “male Lesbians”.

There follows an interesting discussion about whether there is such a thing as male or female pursuits. Mermaids, a Trans Charity for children, has only recently disavowed the notion that toy preferences can indicate you may be trans. This idea does permeates Gender Identity Ideology. You can read more about this here

Charlie tells us they had typical preferences for boys, Alex tells us he only felt the need to reject anything considered “girly” to avoid sowing doubt about their “trans status” in their parents minds. 👇

As we all know Gender is largely a performance. The stakes, however, are higher if you are permanently required to deny your sex and convince onlookers to play along with the illusion. Charlie’s YouTube offers and interesting perspective from the point of view of a self-proclaimed “uber masculine” male and their journey to finding their female identity. Well worth a look at their content to get some insight as to how “women” are assumed to feel. Expect lots of references to make-up, shopping, and girly nights out complete with joint visits to the Ladies Loo! here

Donate

If you want to support my work here is my paypal. Please only do so if you can afford. Any amount will help. tishnaught@me.com

£3.00

Queering the NSPCC? Part Four: Queer Bodies

ChildLine Queer Bodies

This is the fourth in a series looking at ChildLine content and how it promotes Transgender Ideology to children /teens. Gender Identity Ideology saturates their content. Some examples are more egregious than others. This interview 👇, for example, has some good content. It begins with a discussion about pressures on children / teens in the Queer community or LGBTQ+. The subject of the interview would appear to be a Gay male (Roly) who formerly identified as a twink and now has moved on to identify as non-binary and Gender Fluid.

Here is the link to the youtube Link

Here is a transcript: Queer Bodies Alana and Roly

Pressures on Gay Men

It begins well. The two discuss pressure on Gay men to present as “preened and buff“. Roly highlights an internal contradiction. He finds these images appealing whilst, simultaneously, acknowledging the pressure it generates. He is also keen to point out that he doesn’t judge people on their bodies. Nevertheless he felt drawn to identify as a twink because it best fits his body type. One requirement of the twinkdom was to remain skinny and, Roly reveals, this did lead him into an eating disorder. There is increasing research into eating disorders in gay men so this is an important point to make. We are much more aware of eating disorders in females, and too little attention is given to pressures on homosexual males. If you are attracted to your own sex, who you find attractive may foster self-criticism on how you measure up to your own erotic target. This is a particular pressure for same sex attracted males that is worthy of consideration. If you are a femme gay male attracted to hyper masculine men, could this pressure motivate a retreat from identifying as male? I would have liked to see that explored here.

Alana does, at least, recognise the existence of Lesbian women who, she suggests, “may feel she has to be a lipstick lesbian or a butch lesbian”. Unfortunately marred by the preceding comment that these pressures co-exist with “trying to work out what your gender is” . My rejoinder is that 10 years ago this pressure didn’t exist! It’s ubiquity, now, shows every sign of being iatrogenic, Endless content, such as this, in the ChildLine youtube channel is fostering this disassociation from biological reality.

Segues into Trans Identity.

Thus, after a token consideration of the L & G, the conversation moves on to claim how much harder this is for Trans people. The remainder of the interview is all about the T. This seems to be the standard trajectory, a nod to the homosexual community, quickly followed by discussion diverting to yet more Transgender Ideology.

Non-Binary /Gender Fluid

Roly then informs us that he finds it difficult to accept that he is non-binary because he failed to have androgynous role models. Perhaps he should have dug a little deeper into the history of gay men and Gender Non-conforming women? 👇

After he came out as Gender Fluid, he informs us, “people would look at me and be like but you look you’re a man and so it was a long long journey for me”. A good therapist, at this point, would perhaps unpick what underpins this claim to be Gender Fluid. It’s clearly not the way they present and nobody would interpret him as anything other than a biological male.

ChildLine on YouTube

Another feature of these videos is how effusive the interviewers are about YouTube as a source for support and information. Roly is not alone in saying how much YouTube content helped him find role models. The better approach would be to reference to how prominent YouTubers carefully curate their content to present an image to their subscribers. Their platform built on an identity and maintaining it can be vital to continued revenue streams. Typically the Transgender content will be celebratory, not critical. A children’s charity should offer a more skeptical commentary on social influencers. Instead their marketing team seem to be have won the day and collaborations with social media influencers are commonplace.

Gendered Bodies?

Roly provides a rather messianic rant about the imposition of bodily expectations on cross-gendered identities. Forget what you thought you knew about transsexuals. There is no longer any expectation, on people who reject their biological sex, to make any effort to assimilate. The expectations are now on society, to unlearn biological facts, to accept people for who they say they are. Roly provides this advice/instruction for how to live in the New World Order.

Again, for emphasis, Roly is here endorsing the idea of the Gendered Brain, The idea that Gender Identity exists in the brain, This performs two functions that harm women. First it endorses the idea of #LadyBrain. Long used to explain why women are unsuited to certain job roles or positions of power. I am not a proponent of blank slate theory. I don’t dismiss some hard-wired differences, related to evolution. However women have always had to contest this area. to separate the science from the propaganda. Here are two books that cover this area.

Maybe our non-binary friend should have undertaken some reading before he posed this head scratcher.

Without a shred of self-awareness this is what Alana thinks she has done with this interview.

Teaching children not to obsess ❌. Teaching children to accept themselves ❌.

Nope. This is exactly the opposite of what you achieved with this interview.

ChildLine content is not fostering self-acceptance. It is contributing to the inculcation of Gender Dysporia, Bodily disassociative disorders and relentlessly pushing Gender Identity Ideology. I wonder if Esther Rantzen has had a look at it lately?

Queering the NSPCC? Part One. WTF Porn!

Here was the first piece of YouTube content, by ChildLine that kicked off my series on their content. The content I look at here provides its audience (children & teens) with search terms for niche genres of pornography, some of which I had to look up and even then some remained obscure. The fact that a children’s charity, with a statutory role in Safeguarding, would provide a list of Adult search terms for Hardcore pornography should be enough to raise serious concerns about their organisation. The remainder of the series looks at how hard they are peddling Transgender content to their viewers.

FIRST UP: WTF PORN!

ChildLine Content on Porn. https://youtu.be/oE5-RWDqUkk

Here is a transcript of that video. TOMSKA WTF PORN ChildLine

TomSka is a social media influencers recruited by the NSPCC to provide some guidance for children exposed to porn. He also hosts content on a channel called DarkSquidge. His channels are clearly linked on the ChildLine video. There is some attempt to caution about the dangers of porn, the impact on women, and the problematic nature of the porn industry. The tone, however, was anything but cautionary ending with a note of “have Fun” WTF Porn Is an apt title.

Copy here. Archive Copy

Here are a few clips which will give you an idea of the content. The tone is jocular and glorifies access to porn. There is only the merest nod to the harms access to porn can do: to young boys, and the girls who they will practice upon.

The man doing this, and the people who signed this off, clearly thought children need to be given search terms to help them navigate porn sites safely! These terms included Hentai, Hardcore, Facial, BDSM. I myself only found out about Hentai recently and it’s not for the faint hearted. Children should not be taught to fetishise women but ChildLine also highlighted interracial and Lesbian porn. I have no idea what Thespian porn is. Facial pertains to women being ejaculated upon in the face. Children seeing this video are being groomed to see niche, and degrading sexual practices as the norm. I can’t begin to imagine what Swan Disco, Far Cry or NEDM are. What I do know is ChildLine has made a video with a handy list of search terms, for children, for sexual practices that they are far to young to understand.

TomSka tells us that rape is one of the most popular themes in porn! He tells us that if the issue of consent comes up in Porn it is there to be ignored. The section on the Law and porn inserts just enough content to give the appearance of a concern about the impact of porn. However, it in no way offsets the dangerous messages in the rest of the content. How anyone can acknowledge the darker aspects of porn in such a jocular manner eludes me.

Another disturbing element is when he discusses the age of access to porn and asks the viewers this. “You are 18 right?” Again this is done in a jocular matter which makes it clear he knows, full well, he is not talking to 18 year olds.

Then cut to this response, in a child’s voice, as made clear by the subtitles.

Later on the video has a go at educating children about issues of consent. Even here it tells it’s viewers that rough and forceful sex should only be done by consent and with safe words. Once again this is teaching children about a niche adult fetish. The childLine logo is clearly displayed and it remains on their channel. I am left wondering who does due diligence at the NSPCC? I posted this and asked the NSPCC if they still stood by this content. No response. I was however sent some examples of this you tubers twitter content by other concerned tweeters.

And this 👇

Next up. I will have a look at what the NSPCC thinks is important in demonstrating its LGBTQ credentials.

I am currently trying to find some content , on the ChildLine Youtube about what it means to be a same sex attracted Female, i.e. a Lesbian. So far I have found endless Transgender content.

Lesbians? Not so much.

Tag: NSPCC

Queering the NSPCC? FINAL

Queer Theory in Practice.

James Making & Munroe Bergdorf

The NSPCC remained silent for some time until it emerged that the employee had been sacked.

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part 10: Heteronormativity

What does Heteronormativity & Heterosexuality mean?

We risk reversing progress made over 30 years!

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part 9: Asexuality

Coming out as Asexual!

Obfuscation masquerading as Education!

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part 8: Sexual Identity and Gender Identity

Steph on Sexuality and Gender Identity.

Am I bisexual?

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part 7: Trans Identity

Trans Identity : Steph

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part 6: Pansexual

What does it mean to be Pansexual?

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part Five: Trans Puberty Myths

Trans Puberty Myths

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part Four: Queer Bodies

ChildLine Queer Bodies

Pressures on Gay Men

Segues into Trans Identity.

Non-Binary /Gender Fluid

ChildLine on YouTube

Gendered Bodies?

Like this:

Queering the NSPCC? Part One. WTF Porn!

FIRST UP: WTF PORN!

Like this:

Queer Theory in Practice.

James Making & Munroe Bergdorf

The NSPCC remained silent for some time until it emerged that the employee had been sacked.

Share this:

Like this:

What does Heteronormativity & Heterosexuality mean?

We risk reversing progress made over 30 years!

Share this:

Like this:

Coming out as Asexual!

Obfuscation masquerading as Education!

Share this:

Like this:

Steph on Sexuality and Gender Identity.

Am I bisexual?

Share this:

Like this:

Trans Identity : Steph

Share this:

Like this:

What does it mean to be Pansexual?

Share this:

Like this:

Trans Puberty Myths

Share this:

Like this:

ChildLine Queer Bodies

Pressures on Gay Men

Segues into Trans Identity.

Non-Binary /Gender Fluid

ChildLine on YouTube

Gendered Bodies?

Share this:

Like this:

FIRST UP: WTF PORN!

Share this:

Like this: