Morgan was covered in an article in the Times because of his role contributing to NHS Trust guidance; which came under fire for disregarding women’s, sex based, in particular access to single sex wards. The guidance was explicitly in favour of favour of “prioritising trans people”. This 👇 from an article in The Times, link below.
Trans Activists writing NHS Guidance
The guidance also contained other statements straight out of gender identity ideology and, once again, I find myself wondering why medical staff are putting up with this scientifically illiterate tosh.
The toolkit was not put out for public consultation but when eagle eyed women heard about it they demanded an Equality Impact Assessment, from the governing body. This was duly done and concluded the following:
Basically the catastrophic impact on the well being of trans-identified people was considered but the impact on women was completely disregarded.
Having checked the website for North Bristol NHS Trust they don’t appear to publish their “transgender” policy anymore.
The Diversity Trust
Morgan was formerly on the board of The Diversity Trust and, more recently, began working for a new outfit called A New Normal Ltd, as the “Trans Awareness coordinator”.
I have interrogate the publicly available data for both these companies. Morgan was Director of the Diversity Trust until September 2021 and also a trustee.
Diversity Trust has had grant income from Gloucestershire City Council, The National Lottery and entered into collaborative research projects with Bristol University. In the accounts from 2019 we are told that the majority of their income comes from their courses and that “trans” awareness is the most popular; delivered by Morgan.
They also deliver LGBTQ+ training to schools.
We also discover that Morgan has been delivering lectures to Social Work, Psychology and Law students.
They also delivered Hate Crime Awareness training to the following groups which, as you can see, included the magistrates court and the police force.
The trust also delivers unconscious bias training and has quite a reach in the University Sector.
The Trust also host a podcast series with guests like member of parliament, Stella Creasy and activist Peter Tatchell and Christine Burns.
The trust seem very embedded with local councils, the local NHS and of course attend local Pride events.
Here is one of their case studies who attended one of their youth groups. A learning disabled kid with mental health problems, who they called Sam, has a bodily disassociative condition that is being affirmed by the use of new pronouns.
Here is one of their events with an academic who is clearly saturated in Queer Theory.
I had to look up plurisexuality. I am still none the wiser.
You can find on Linkedin with lists of her publications, including this gem.
A New Normal Ltd.
Some time after Morgan left The Diversity Trust he joined an organisation called New Normal Ltd as their “trans” representative.
Companies house indicates that this is the company.
Only one director is listed, a Patricia Driver. The twitter bio trumpets the usual virtue signalling credentials, pronouns, alleged feminist, black lives matter and a refusal to sex her children.
A check on the twitter account reveals the connection with Morgan though the twitter account linked may be incorrect.
You can find their website here 👇
Here’s Morgan
Here’s an example from their website showing the student level appreciation of the issues. This is an image used on a blog which celebrates the opposition to the #LetWomenSpeak tour.A tour which still has outstanding court cases for violence against the women who participated.
There’s not much to find in the accounts for this single director company, so it is worth spending some time looking into the person they have employed to lead on “trans” issues.
Morgan’s Blog
Here is Morgan’s website.👇
Morgan writes on science fiction, fandom as well as speculations about the nature of “gender” and “sex” as well as taking side swipes at feminists such as Germaine Greer and Julie Bindel. He doesn’t overlook less well known women. This is a clip from2015. Not only does he use the phrase terf, a recognised slur, but he refers to feminists as an “infestation”.
Here is Morgan claiming feminists are the ones who disregard females who opt out of their sex. With breathtaking chutzpah, he claims the real issue is not women being affected by men like Morgan entering our spaces but “transmen” who are using male facilities. Morgan accepts that females using male spaces are at risk but denies any impact on women when he uses female spaces! This argument only works if we accept that men who use women’s facilities are actually women which is where we started. He makes a habit of using cynical arguments about “transmen” to advance his own cause.
Morgan claims to have “transitioned” in his late thirties, he is now 66. There doesn’t appear to be a transwidow in the background. The only relationship he talks about is with someone called Kevin who he lives with. On marrying Kevin he claims the relationship is complicated and marriage is difficult. This is a stretch because it was possible for “trans” people to marry before it was legal for same sex couples who did not identify as “trans”.
Morgan’s twitter account appears to have disappeared but there are archival tweets where he claims to be able to breast feed.
It is worth looking at this YouTube video, from A New Normal. to unpick some of the lies and half truths Morgan is selling to the NHS, Schools, and local government officials which, unfortunately, they are buying.
YouTube content.
First up is this one from New Normal Ltd.
Morgan in this interview is asked about what risks “trans” people face and he responds with the ludicrous claim that the actual people at risk are “cis” people who are mistaken as “trans”
He continues on this theme designed to paint this as a moral panic which disproportionately impacts Butch Lesbians with the implication he has “passing privilege” and they don’t.
He continues on this theme arguing that the other people at risk are “cis” women who wear pronoun badges and are mistaken for “trans”. I mention this not as a “gotcha” about his appearance but because of the seemingly pathological claim of “passing privilege” and the claim that the current demands for single sex spaces don’t impact him but only actual women who are mistaken for “trans”.
There is also this extraordinary exchange over “trans” people in sport on which the interviewer has this to say. There is such a failure in logic here. All Olympians are at elite level male advantage persists and has resulted in mediocre male athletes taking top spots in the female category.
More scientific illiteracy follows in Morgan’s reply. Firstly, “transwomen” are not completely banned they are just expected to compete in the correct category for their sex. (They have even been offered an open category but there were no takers). Females on testosterone are not allowed to compete against other females so this is a lie. Interesting that he claims “trans men” have a competitive advantage but is unwilling to concede there is any advantage for actual men.
In this interview he also takes aim at the Equality and Human Rights Commission; claiming they have an agenda to roll back “trans” rights. He is also critical of the Scottish government for the failure to pass the “Self ID” bill.
In another YouTube for A New Normal, Morgan discusses medical treatments for children rates of detransition and the sport issue. On the medical treatments he neatly sidesteps the issue of puberty blockers (In the U.K. puberty blockers are started in children as young as 10) to focus on only cross sex hormones and surgeries. He is correct that the NHS only allows CSH from age 16 and surgeries from age 18. He omits the private providers who are not bound my these age restrictions and also practice in the United States, where we know girls as young as 13 are given double mastectomies. On the detransition issue he focuses on one study which appeared to follow up patients for only one year. Regret rates don’t appear at one year post surgery so he is being disingenuous. On the sport issue he misrepresents the arguments stating that women campaigning for fair sport are saying all men are invariably better than all women. That is not the argument being advanced to exclude men from female sports.
The argument is that men, as a sex class, have the advantages conferred by a male puberty. Average performing men can outperform even elite female athletes because of their male advantages.
Here are some graphics representing male advantage.
You can watch Morgan talking about these issues in the YouTube linked below.
You can read the full article on male advantages in sport here 👇
HR Zone: Transition at Work
Morgan also provides advice in HR articles about “transitioning” at work. He makes it clear that everyone must be pressed into service to validate the “trans” person.
Women must accept bepenised men in our spaces because many will have delayed access to surgeries.
Nevertheless, we are reassured, nobody will take advantage of this for nefarious purposes.
Written Evidence to Transgender Equality Inquiry
Before we leave Morgan to his own de-vices it’s worth having a brief look at his submission to the transgender equality inquiry. Note that, not content with claiming “woman” he claims “female”.
He calls the spousal exit clause a vindictive piece of legislation. As a reminder this doesn’t allow a spouse (usually a wife) any power to prevent her husband pursuing sex falsification hormones and surgeries. It just allows the wife time to divorce and prevent her being redefined in law with a “lesbian” divorce. The man is allowed an interim GRC which grants all the same rights as a full GRC but stops at his ability to redefine the marriage as between two females. In order to justify the description of “vindictive” he imagines a scenario where the woman deliberately remains in the marriage to prevent the husband from getting a full GRC.
He also wishes to challenge the sex by deception offence. This allows a criminal charge to be made if someone fails to reveal their sex to a sexual partner. I did a series on this offence which, as far as I can ascertain, has mainly involved females tricking other females. This is a law Stonewall wants to review and so far the law has judged that deception as to your biological sex vitiates consent.
It is unsurprising that Morgan is spouting the Stonewall line because he was /is a Stonewall role model
You can read my series on sex by deception here: 👇
There’s plenty more material on Morgan which is easy to find. I think this gives you the measure of the man.
You can support my work by taking out a paid subscription to my substack or donating below. All donations gratefully received and they do help me cover my costs and also to keep content open for those not able to contribute. (I will add other methods as soon as I have figured it out. 😉)
Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.
£10.00