Un Women U.K. : Pickard 2

Featured

Bobbi Pickard : Part Two

You can read part one here:

UN Women UK: Pickard 1

Bobbi Pickard is a trans-identified man who came to my attention after UN Women U.K. nominated him, and a few other men, to represent women at a conference run by the United Nations. I have written about UN Women U.K. here: 👇

UN Women U.K. (Faux Feminism)

In part two we will look at Pickard’s company and corporate support and examine the role he claims to have played in advancing “trans” rights in complete disregard for the impact on other protected groups and the health of children designated “trans”.

Pickard founded this company, after claiming his woman identity in 2017. It was incorporated in 2022. There’s not much information in the accounts, in terms of donors. They don’t have a huge balance sheet. (There are new accounts due out shortly so I will update when they are out)

They seem to wield rather a lot of soft power rather than financial clout. Here’s on of the directors of Trans in the City. One of them is this Arlene Mcdermott, a Lesbian , who is in a senior position at the London Stock exchange. This explains why Pickard was the first “trans” person to close the London Stock exchange and why they have an annual event for “trans” people at the London Stock Exchange (LSEG).

Pickard’s website for Trans in the City boasts an impressive array of corporate sponsors.

According to his appearance on Gender Nebulous both Clifford Chance and JP Morgan have sponsored conferences /event venues.

Bobby’s own piece on the Trans In The City website shows an impressive array of contacts /supporters in his own right. Of course Stonewall, Diva appear as well as , shamefully, The Lesbian Visibility logo. However, Lesbian Visibility Week, in the U.K. , is the creature of Linda Riley who is Queen of the Vichy Lesbians.

Gender Nebulous Podcast /Youtube

Hosts: Victoria Hodges / Freda Wallace

Link To Gender Nebulous

Freda Wallace should,not need any introduction and I am not inclined to share the photo he posted from a Sex Dungeon, indulging in a sex act. Victoria can be found complaining about Center Parcs policy which decreed that men, who retain their penis, are not allowed to use the changing rooms for women and girls. Wallace is not the interviewer for this piece which was a solo spot for Hodges.

Pickard is not given to attacking “terfs” publicly or making the more outrageous statements. He’s a corporate man and knows how to moderate his tone to wield influence. He’s more likely to let his guard down when talking to other “trans” influencers. Hence this,on the Gender Nebulous podcast, where he can’t resist celebrating the (temporary) You Tube ban for Kellie J Keen.

In this podcast Bobbi talks about being a “trans” activist since the late 80’s, early 90’s and going to “trans” events across the country. It’s not clear what form this activism took, and whether it was merely cross-dressing events; certainly the events were described in terms more suggestive of social occasions, than protests.

Bobbi was on the organising commitee for Cheltenham Pride which attracted a who’s Who’ of Trans activists

In this segment some tension is revealed between Pickard’s organisation and Stonewall. It is alleged Stonewall claimed credit for a campaign that Pickard says originated with Trans In The City. It certainly seems to me that we need to make sure Stonewall don’t draw all the fire when this influential organisation seems to be flying under the radar.

Pickard is keen to emphasise their global reach which certainly seems more impressive than their accounts. (I will update when they submit their 2024 accounts which are due soon).

Pickard has been interviewed by Hodges in an earlier incarnation of his podcast called “Transclusive”. Pickard is very consistent about the role he sees himself playing to advance the rights of sex denialists.

Cool2Be Trans with Katie Neeve.

Katie is another heterosexual man and father who has been invited to represent women at the United Nations. Genevieve Gluck has a thread about “Katie” that provides a good introduction to who he is.

Katie Neeves

Bobbi opens with a story about his childhood and recalls his sitting under his mum’s (not the) ironing board wondering what he had done wrong because his mother didn’t buy him girl clothes and girl’s toys. He also recall, when he was five or six, going round to his nan’s house and raising the dressing up box for wigs and floaty clothes. His parents disapproved so he was reduced to dressing his action man in Barbie outfits. This was, he says, his true self that he was forced to hide away and the beginning of the self loathing and suicidal thoughts culminating in a night spent holding a knife to his throat at the age of 14. He finally “came out” age 48 having married and fathered kids in the meantime; his children are the reason why he wouldn’t change anything. This followed a reported suicide attempt after which he realised he had to “transition” or die. There follows a discussion where they both talk about how amazing gift that is “Gender Euphoria” .Both agree that they would not change their pasts.

Pickard then talks about setting up Trans in the City and coming out as the first “trans” person at BP, where he was a senior manager. The aim of Trans in The City was to get corporate sign up and at the time of this interview he claims to have 250 officially signed up and 300 unofficially aligned. Here is the list on their website today,

He then got involved in the campaign to reform the Gender Recognition Act . He noticed that, while there were excellent campaigns by Gendered Intelligence and Mermaids, there was nothing from the corporate world.

To this end Pickard talks about his role in instigating corporate backing. You will recall that women’s rights campaigners in effect stopped the introduction of Self-ID but Pickard and Neeves are claiming it as a victory for their side.

There follows a discussion about the lamentable situation for “trans” rights in the U.K. and how we are worse than Argentina. After “stopping the GRA” by which he means stopping any roll back of the existing protections for “gender reassignment” he then instigated the “Trans Rights Are Human Rights” campaign. We know, from above, that this was a joint campaign with Stonewall but he gives us a further insight into how that campaign came about. He intended it to counter the Women’s Rights campaigners who were talking “rubbish”. Of course he calls them “anti-trans” and has a sly dig at J.K Rowling.

He then credits Pedro Pino, of google.

He then explains that he was on a panel with Pino and he expressed his anger at the lack of concrete support from global corporates for “trans” rights. At the time Pino occupied a senior role at google. He has now moved onto YouTube.

Pino is a gay man who is completely signed up to the trans cult, here is is with the performative pronouns.

After sitting on a panel Pickard he connected Pickard with Stonewall.

Pino had history with Stonewall having partnered with them in the past.

Journalist, Jo Bartosch, spotted this extraordinary interference in U.K. domestic affairs in an article she penned in 2020.

Big Business and the GRA

Pickard then lists all the other corporates that have come on board with the “trans” agenda. It’s an impressive list.

Neeves then interjects to say he felt the turning point was when the British Army came on board and suggests this was a key lever to persuade Local Authorities to dispense with their fears this was too much of a political hot potato. Below Pickard confirms they have the support of the armed forces along with other corporate bodies.

Neves and Pickard then bask in the warm glow of all the support they have had since becoming full-time cross-dressers. They are certain that the vast majority of people are on their side and not the nasty feminists. They then talk about the need to educate people and how they forgive the clumsy language of neophytes, how noble!

Pickard then explains that this is a U.K specific issue (Go, Terf Island!) and that he runs courses all over the world, including the middle east, and encounters no resistance. (I assume he means countries that don’t allow women and homosexuals full human rights, so that should tell him something.). He is convinced that there only a tiny number of transphobes

You can support my work by taking out a paid subscription to my substack or donating below. All donations gratefully received and they do help me cover my costs and also to keep content open for those not able to contribute. I am in extra need this month after having paid £288 for my site, Only give if you can afford!

My Substack

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00

UN Women UK: Pickard 1

Featured

Bobbie Pickard 1

As part of my series on UN Women U.K. I am going to have a look at all the men who have been chosen as delegates to the United Nations at a conference to represent Women. First up is Bobbi Pickard. There is quite a lot to cover on Pickard so this will be Part One.

Pickard came out officially. as a faux woman, in 2017. He has been employed as a senior manager with British Petroleum for much of his career, either directly or as a self employed consultant. He is also CEO of Trans in the City which we will cover more in Part Two. According to his linkedin he has a HNC in Electrical Engineering. As you can see from the above profile he also has links with Stonewall. He was also appointed a trustee of Mermaids in May 2020.

According to Mermaid’s accounts he was not a trustee for long. (Note the two anonymous trustees.). His departure from Mermaids was for personal reasons related to him having genital surgery. He regards the ex CEO of Mermaids. Susie Green, as a personal friend,

Pickard is a heterosexual man who has fathered two children, although he now describes himself as a lesbian and if you don’t like it, you can mind your own business!

When I find late transitioning males, who are heterosexual and claim to be Lesbians, I generally look for reports of early cross dressing which is, almost invariably, present. Pickard is quite reticent about how his gender identity manifested itself, prior to deciding he was a woman. He is at pains to deny any link to fetish or a sexual motivation as illustrated by this, now deleted, comment 👇 on his website. He favours a medical explanation.

The deletion of the above 👆 is interesting. Having read many of these narratives the reference to cross dressing, sometimes with an acknowledgement of the sexual motive, is a recurrent theme. Pickard does admit to dressing up at his nan’s house as a five year old. However, Pickard also talks about an over bearing father, who was injured when Pickard was a small boy, and became mentally unstable. He also talks about the roots in trauma for a cross sex identification which could be a factor or an attempt at deflection. I have had long discussion with a detransitioned man whose motive to transition was rooted in childhood trauma so I would not totally dismiss this interpretation. In any case this is the less interesting part of Pickard’s story as I will demonstrate in part two.

Pickard does have a twitter account @BobbityP but is not very active. I am blocked but it seems to mainly consist of celebrating various awards from LGBTQ+ organisations and there does not seem to be India Willoughby levels of vitriol. He claims that he is a very contented in his “trans” identity but there is one slightly unhinged reaction to a Boots question. The levels of male entitlement and, frankly, insanity to object to being asked your sex. Your sex is a good indicator of the propensity to some diseases and the likely severity.

This is not a casual bit of snark. The NHS is capitulating to the sex denialism and this is doubly disadvantageous to women because the default medical research subject is male. Like it or not, SEX MATTERS, Yes, even in flu.

Disorders of Sexual Development/Intersex

The insistence on a biological reason for his being “trans” is a recurring theme in Pickard’s appearance in the media. He seems to rely on Anne Fausto-Sterling who famously said being “intersex” (not “transgender”) was as common as being a redhead. She also claimed there there were five biological sexes a claim that has been subject to, at a minimum, serious challenge. Pickard makes this claim in a discussion with Peter Tatchell.

Fausto-Sterling’s claims have been comprehensively debunked in this article by Leonard Sax.

Fausto-Sterling also later claimed that her insistence on five biological sexes was tongue in cheek in this exchange with biologist Colin Wright.

Pickard and Peter Tatchell.

It is worth watching the discussion with Tatchell, in full if only for this astonishing claim by Tatchell.

I am not going to spend too much time on Tatchell, for the purposes of this post, but I might add to my series on Tatchell which you can find here:👇

Peter Tatchell

He does deserve calling out this statement which attempts to paint feminists as the one unwilling to debate as if we don’t all recall that the #NoDebate hashtagcame from his side.

He will proceed to argue that those “trans” people who won’t debate are in fear for their safety; whilst not extending the same consideration to women. He also makes this statement before arguing that women are only partially oppressed on the basis of their sex. No, they are singled out more for their gender non-conformity which is, he thinks, why we should make common case with men who want to express themselves in stereotypical ways.🤷‍♀️

Pickard’s contribution is that he’s always been trans, has known since he was six. Since he partnered with a woman and had children, before coming out in 2017, I am a tad skeptical.

He then goes on to advance arguments about brain sex; female brain in a male body, then an appeal,to emotion that it was either “transition” or commit suicide. I won’t cover those arguments here because he repeats them in a one to one interview which I will cover next.

You can find this discussion here 👇

Peter Tatchell and Bobbi Pickard

Pickard interviewed by Emma Woollcott

Mishcon de Reya: An international Law Firm

Here is more information on Emma which contains the delicious irony that, among other things, she is head of reputation management and advises charities on reputational risk and data protection concerns. Think about this when they get on to discuss Pickard’s role as a Trustee of Mermaids!

I had a squint at Woollcott’s Linkedin and, of course she has pronouns in her bio and I could not resist adding this clip from her feed. Not only are women not just smaller men a massive bloke (or a small one) is never a woman! It’s is worth noting that Emma did an internship with the law firm Clifford Chance , who are themselves proponents of transgender ideology.

I will leave the revelations about the organisation Trans in The City until part two. I will cover Pickard’s theories about why he is “transgender” and his promotion of Mermaids.

Here is a link to the interview: 👇

Pickard interviews by a She /Her

Bearing in mind that this man goes into schools to promote his magical thinking.

Woollcott asks Pickard to describe his journey to coming out as transgender and why transgender people exist. She sets up the question by telling the viewer that he has done his research which lends a veneer of credibility to his theories. As above he goes the brain sex route:

I am highly skeptical about this claim after years of observing the hyper masculine behaviour of heterosexual men, who identify as women. There is research that suggest there are detectable brain differences between straight men and gay men so, those that don’t control for homosexuality are missing a confounding variable. Some studies also didn’t exclude the men who had taken cross sex hormones and did not allow for the impact of neuroplasticity. Could regular cos playing as women have had an impact on the brain due to neuroplasticity?. Reading the work of Dr Ann Lawrence, himself an autogynephilic male, also lead me to wonder if the sexual fantasies of those with autogynephilia also may have an impact on brain structure that is noting to do with female brains in male bodies.

You can read my series on Lawrence here:

Dr Ann Lawrence

Perhaps the stronger argument agains the prenatal hormone argument is identical twins where only one of them identifies as “transgender”. Based on my reading the result is higher than in non identical twins but nowhere near a 100% correlation.

I found his body language quite interesting at this point, looking down, fiddling with his hair and smirking. I would not be at all suprised if he doesn’t believe a word of it and this is an exhibition of dupers delight.

I find this argument, from Pickard, more plausible. A boy whose father suffered an injury and subsequent mental health issues at an impressionable age. Over identification with the mother, Perhaps the father was abusive to the boy, maybe even the mother. I could well imagine a rejection of being male when your own role model is so negative.

I was almost minded to sympathy at this point but the clear failure to identify with women’s concerns soon made me have a word with myself. Here he is on the proposed reform of the Gender Recognition Act. I have done a series on Gender Recognition Certificates this is fanciful nonsense. I also very much doubt so much political capital would have been expended on something that is “already the case”

You can read my series on Gender Recognition Certificates here: 👇

Gender Recognition Certificates

Where Pickard lost any goodwill I might have had was his schilling for Mermaids. The disgraceful lies about suicide which are easily debunked. Likewise the statement on puberty blockers, also easily disproved. 98% of those who start on puberty blockers, to block puberty from starting, progress to cross sex hormones. As a result they will be sterile and likely anorgasmic. Reminder that Pickard had children and, presumably a satisfactory sex life.

Those of us who have been writing about this for over six years can now point to the fact that puberty blockers are now banned, at least for under 16’s.

More on the most marginalised group, ever, in part two.

You can support my work by taking out a paid subscription to my substack or donating below. All donations gratefully received and they do help me cover my costs and also to keep content open for those not able to contribute. I have lots of renewals due soon for maintaining this site so donations would be particularly welcome. That said, don’t prioritise me over the many crowd funders we have at the moment and only consider it if you have spare cash.

My Substack

Researching the history and the present of the “transgender” movement and the harm it is wreaking on our society.

£10.00